Tag: Informed consent

CCVAC logo

People’s Vaccine Inquiry launches

The People’s Vaccine Inquiry, launched on June 10 2024, features submissions from CCVAC lead Dr Ros Jones, along with other expert witnesses.

The official website for the Inquiry, where you can read the statements and watch video testimony, is below.

CCVAC logo

Letter to Liz Truss from the CCVAC

26th September, 2022

The Rt Hon Liz Truss

The Prime Minister
10, Downing Street,
London, SW1A 2AA 

Dear Ms Truss,

Re: Covid-19 Vaccines for Children

Firstly, congratulations on becoming our new Prime Minister.

You will no doubt have many pressing matters as you take up office.  But what can be more important than the health and well-being of the nation’s children? 

We, the undersigned health professionals and scientists, have huge concerns about the safety and necessity of Covid-19 vaccines for children, for reasons detailed in the letters enclosed. Between us, we have written numerous letters to the regulators, copied to your predecessor, regarding use of these mRNA products in children.  We call upon you, urgently, to pause the Covid-19 vaccine rollout for healthy under 18s, while a thorough and independent safety review is undertaken.  We urge you to reconsider their deployment for the following reasons:

  • Covid-19 was always a much milder illness in children, with a risk of death for otherwise healthy children of around 1 in 2 million. Successive variants have become less virulent, reducing the risk still further.
  • In addition, there is considerable evidence of rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, and increasing concerns over immediate vaccines injuries (such as myocarditis with its known potential for severe and possibly permanent cardiac damage). 
  • There is still a total lack of long-term safety data and the worrying rise in excess non-Covid deaths[1] in young males aged 15-19 years has yet to be explained. 
  • Lastly, the vast majority of children have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly and have achieved demonstrably effective immunity, which is far superior to vaccine-induced immunity.

In short, the balance of benefit and risk, used to support the rollout of mRNA vaccines to the elderly and vulnerable in 2021, is inappropriate and inapplicable for children in 2022. 

Below are links to all the fully referenced letters we have written to the MHRA, the JCVI and the CMOs over the past sixteen months. The detailed questions posed have never been properly addressed by these regulators. You may be aware that members of the Pandemic Response All Party Parliamentary Group also wrote to the JCVI in January 2022, regarding the documented increase in all-cause mortality in 15-19-year-old males, again with no satisfactory reply addressing their concerns.

Groups of health professionals from around the world have similar concerns and indeed some countries have already paused children’s Covid-19 vaccines, particularly for those who have already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.  The Danish Minister of Health recently declared that vaccinating children had been a mistake and has withdrawn it for healthy children. It is gratifying to see that in the UK the vaccine rollout for healthy 5-11s has been discontinued last week, but this leaves 12-17-years-olds still in an unnecessary programme.

The health of the nation’s children is of paramount concern and must surely be a high priority for an incoming Prime Minister. You will no doubt be aware of Sir Christopher Chope’s tireless work on a Covid-19 Vaccine Damage Bill,pushing for proper and fair compensation for thousands of vaccine-damaged adults.  You cannot allow the risk of Covid-19 vaccine injuries in children, who stand to gain zero benefit from vaccination due to the overwhelming majority having already been infected, and who have therefore already acquired natural immunity.

We entreat you to apply the precautionary principle to the use of these products, which still have no long-term safety data and remain in Phase 3 clinical trials. The evidence of damage that this rushed policy is causing for children mounts daily. 

In addition to concerns about the physical risk to children posed by these mRNA products, we would also remind you of the acknowledged and significant psychological and educational damage to children which resulted from the school closures and masking requirements implemented by your predecessor.  We would ask that, as a matter of urgency, you make clear that school closures and masking of schoolchildren will not be repeated under your watch. 

At the beginning of your term as Prime Minister, you have a critical opportunity to prevent avoidable damage to children, and the inevitable outcry and backlash that will follow, by pausing the rollout with immediate effect, as well as bringing to an end all harmful covid restrictions in schools. This is a risk-free action.  Until then, the political and health risks of these damaging policies will only escalate. 

We eagerly await your response. 

Wishing you well in the challenging job you have ahead.

Yours sincerely,

Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician, 

on behalf of members of CCVAC (Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Council) and many others…

CCVAC members 
Professor Anthony J BrookesProfessor of Genomics and Health Data Science, University of Leicester
Professor Angus Dalgleish MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Principal, Institute for Cancer Vaccines & Immunotherapy (ICVI)
Professor Richard EnnosMA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh
Professor John FaircloughFRCS FFSEM, retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon
Professor Norman FentonCEng, CMath, PhD, FBCS, MIET, Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London
Prof Anthony FryerPhD, FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University 
Professor David LivermoreBSc, PhD, retired Professor of Medical Microbiology
Professor Dennis McGonaglePhD, FRCPI, Consultant Rheumatologist, University of Leeds
Professor Keith WillisonPhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial College, London
Lord MoonieMBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, retired member of the House of Lords, former parliamentary under-secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine
Dr Sonia AllumMBChB, FRCA, Consultant anaesthetist
Julie AnnakinRN, Immunisation Specialist Nurse
Dr Abby AstleMBBChir, BA(Cantab), DCH, DGM, MRCGP, GP Principal, GP Trainer, GP Examiner
Dr Elyse Baril-GuerardMD, CCFP, MRCGP, General Practitioner
Dr Michael BazlintonMBCHB MRCGP DCH, General Practitioner
Dr David BellMBBS, PhD, FRCP(UK), Public Health Physician
Dr Mark A BellMBChB, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, Consultant in Emergency Medicine
Dr Michael D BellMBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner
Dr Alan BlackMBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, retired Pharmaceutical Physician
Dr David BrambleMBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist
Dr Emma BrierlyMBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner
Kim BullFoundation Degree in Paramedic Science, Paramedic
Mr John BunniMBChB (Hons), Dip Lap Surg, FRCS [ASGBI Medal] – Consultant Colorectal and General Surgeon
Dr Elizabeth BurtonMB ChB, retired General Practitioner
Dr David CartlandMBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner
Dr Peter ChanBM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine
Dr  Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist, Visiting Professor
Michael CockayneMSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner
Dr Julie CoffeyMBChB, General Practitioner
RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner, retired
Mr Ian F ComaishMA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant Ophthalmologist
James CookNHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health
Dr Clare Craig BMBCh, FRCPath, Diagnostic Pathologist
Dr David CritchleyBSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D
Dr Sue de LacyMBBS MRCGP AFMCP UK, Integrative Medicine Doctor
Dr Jayne LM Donegan MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, Homeopathic Practitioner
Dr Damien Downing MBBS, MRSB, private physician
Dr Jonathan EastwoodGeneral Practitioner, BSc MB ChB MRCGP
Dr Jonathan Engler MBChB, LlB (hons), DipPharmMed
Dr Elizabeth Evans MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, retired Doctor, Director UKMFA
Dr Christopher Exley PhD FRSB, retired professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry
Dr John Flack  BPharm, PhD, retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals, retired Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery SmithKline Beecham
Dr Charles Forsyth MBBS, BSEM, Independent Medical Practitioner
Dr Simon Fox BSc, BMBCh, FRCP, Consultant in Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine
Dr Jenny Goodman MA, MBChB, Ecological Medicine
Dr Ali Haggett Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine 
David HalpinMB BS FRCS, Orthopaedic and trauma surgeon (retired)
Dr Catherine HattonMBChB, General Practitioner 
Mr Anthony HintonMBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London
Dr Renée HoenderkampfGeneral Practitioner
Dr Andrew IsaacMB BCh, Physician, retired
Dr Steve JamesMBBS, MA, FRCA, FFICM, Critical Care Consultant
Dr Keith JohnsonBA, DPhil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing
Dr Pauline JonesMB BS, Retired General Practitioner
Dr Gemma KempMBBS, FRCPath, Consultant Forensic Pathologist
Dr Tanya KlymenkoPhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences
Dr Charles LaneMA, DPhil, Molecular Biologist
Dr Branko LatinkicBSc, PhD, Molecular Biologist
Dr Caroline Lapworth MBChB General Practitioner
Dr Theresa LawrieMBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath
Dr Jason LesterMRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist
Dr Felicity LillingstoneIMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow
Mr Malcolm LoudonMBChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS(Gen Surg), MIHM,VR, Consultant Surgeon
Katherine MacGilchristBSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd
Dr Geoffrey MaidmentMBBS, MD, FRCP, Consultant physician, retired
Ahmad K MalikFRCS(Tr & Orth) Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon
Dr Ayiesha MalikMBChB, General Practitioner
Dr Kulvinder Singh ManikMBBS, General Practitioner
Dr Fiona MartindaleMBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner
Dr Julie MaxwellMBBCh, MRCPCH, Associate Specialist Community Paediatrician
Dr S McBrideBSc(Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP(Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics
Mr Ian McDermottMBBS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon
Dr Scott McLachlanFAIDH, MCSE, MCT, DSysEng, LLM, MPhil, Postdoctoral researcher
Dr Manjul MedhiMBChB MRCP DTM&H, Consultant in Infectious Disaeases and General Medicine
Dr Franziska MeuschelMD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine
Dr Scott MitchellMBChB, MRCS, Emergency Medicine Physician
Dr Alan MordueMBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology
Dr David MorrisMBChB, MRCP(UK), General Practitioner
Dr Claire MottramBSc Hons, MBChB, Doctor in General Practice
Margaret MossMA(Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire
Dr Alice MurkiesMD, FRACGP, MBBS, General Practitioner
Dr Greta MushetMBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy
Dr Sarah MyhillMBBS, retired GP and Naturopathic Physician
Mr Colin NataliBSc(hons) MBBS, FRCS (Orth), Consultant Spinal Surgeon
Dr Chris NewtonPhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism
Dr Rachel NichollPhD, Medical researcher
Dr Richard J O’SheaMBBCh, BA(Hons) MRCGP, General Practitioner
Sue Parker Hallcertified transactional analyst (CTA, psychotherapy); MSc (Counselling & Supervision) MBACP (senior accredited practitioner); EMDR practitioner, Psychotherapist
Dr Dean PattersonMBChB, FRCP, Consultant Cardiologist
Dr Christina PeersMBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause specialist 
Rev Dr William J U PhilipMB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology
Anna PhillipsRSCN, BSc Hons, Clinical Lead Trainer Clinical Systems (Paediatric Intensive Care)
Dr Angharad PowellMBChB, BSc (hons), DFRSH, DCP (Ireland), DRCOG, DipOccMed, MRCGP, General Practitioner
Dr Gerry QuinnPhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology
Dr Johanna ReillyMBBS, General Practitioner
Jessica RighartMSc, MIBMS, Senior Critical Care Scientist
Mr Angus RobertsonBSc, MB ChB, FRCSEd (Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon
Dr Jessica RobinsonBSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCPsych, MFHom, Psychiatrist and Integrative Medicine Doctor
Dr Jon RogersMB ChB (Bristol), Retired General Practitioner
Mr James RoyleMBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon 
Dr Salmaan SaleemMBBS, BMedSci, MRCGP, General Practitioner 
Dr Roland SalmonMB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales
Sorrel ScottGrad Dip Phys, Specialist Physiotherapist in Neurology, 30 years in NHS
Dr Rohaan SethBSc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner
Dr Haleema SheikhMRCGP, General Practitioner
Dr Gary Sidleyretired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist
Dr Annabel SmartMBBS, BSc, retired General Practitioner
Natalie StephensonBSc (Hons) Paediatric Audiologist 
Dr Zenobia StorahMA (Oxon), Dip Psych, DClinPsy, Senior Clinical Psychologist (Child and Adolescent) 
Dr Noel ThomasMA, MBChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor
Dr Stephen TingMB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician
Dr Julian TompkinsonMBChB MRCGP, General Practitioner, GP trainer PCME
Suzanne TomkinsonBSc, MSc, CSci, FIBMS, Senior Biomedical Scientist (Clinical Biochemistry)
Dr Livia Tossici-BoltPhD, Clinical Scientist
Dr Helen WestwoodMBChB, MRCGP, DCH, DRCOG, General Practitioner
Dr Carmen WheatleyDPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology
Mr Lasantha WijesingheFRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon
Dr Damian WildePhD, (Chartered) Specialist Clinical Psychologist
Dr Ruth WildeMB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor
Dr Lucie WilkMD, Consultant Rheumatologist
Dr Stefanie WilliamsMD, Dermatologist
Dr Holly YoungBSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Palliative Care Medicine
  
Other signatoriesHealth professionals and scientists
Zuzana Herbst MantonRegistered Nurse
Dr M SyedaGeneral Practitioner, MRCGP
Jane Philebrown RGN, Triage/Practice Nurse
CharlotteOccupational Therapist
Rachelle brownPhysiotherapist
Caroline BrightRegistered Nurse-Theatres
Jonathan ClearyMBBS, MRCGP, FRACGP, FACRRM. General Practitioner 
Josephine TuckerSRN (retired)  and UKCP registered Psycotherapist (Self Employed)
Cristina GastaldiAcupuncture Pain Clinic 
Kelly AllenSenior Nursing Sister RNC
Suki ClarkeMidwife
EmmaMaternity HCA
JaneHealth Visitor Registered Nurse
Joanna BarkerRMN
Nikki TapalPhlebotomy manager
Natalia DayNurse
Dr Ross C WorthingtonSports Medicine, BM BCh
Amanda STANIERNurse RGN 
Kellie MorrissSenior Health Care Assistant/Student NA 
Amanda CairnsSCPHN MSc (OH)
Cassandra HamiltonStudent Nurse
Ellen Calteau Registered Dietitian HCPC registered 
Trudy GriffithsCare and support worker 
Julie TaskerComplementary Therapist and retired Tutor 
Jeanne Van der WeydenOccupational Health Nurse, Certificate in Tropical Diseases, Midwife (not practising)
Rosie RobertsPharmacy Technician
Ameena LewisNHS BLOODS TRANSPORT
Dr Neil K Gibbs BSc MPhil PhD FRSB, Biomedical Scientist  
Paul SeddonGeneral practitioner BSc MBBS DCH DRCOG DOcc Med MRCGP
Charlotte GowersOccupational Therapist 
Dr Graham MilneMB ChB, General Practitioner 
Dare MasonPsychotherapist, DipPsych, BSc
Paula CharnleyPsychotherapist
Dr Christian BucklandPsychotherapist, Psych(D), UKCP, MBACP, MUPCA
Vanessa ChurchillChiropractor/Homeopath, BSc (Chiro) DC LHM
Hilary HullTherapy Radiographer 
Louise PriestmanRegistered Nurse
Vicky NorrisCarer
David NashRegistered Nurse
Dr Rajendra SharmaMB BCh BAO LRCP&S(Ire) MFHom, Private Physician. 
Raine MarshallMental health nurse 
Samantha LomasCounsellor
Stephen JonesOccupational Therapist. BHSc (Hons) Occupational Therapy
Fiona CrowhurstRetired Registered General Nurse
Lynette DalyRetired Midwife 
Janice GiddyBA Hons Counselling. Retired staff counsellor NHS
Dr Kevin P CorbettRetired RN and PhD health scientist
Dr Robert John DurlingDental Surgeon
Kim Griffin 
Veronica De LucaSenior Nurse/Sister
Debbie WellsCardiac associate practitioner 
Nadina HoldenRN Adult & NICU Specialist BSc Hons
Sally Johns Green MBACPCounsellor/Play therapist, Diploma in Professional Studies
ElaineHaematology Sister 
Brian Howard D.O.Osteopath
Iain McWilliam LeithRetired GP then independent doctor
Ann Helena RobinsonHCA MRI and CT Scanning
Dr Emma Gillett DCChiropractor
Mrs Susan StanleySRN, SCM, (Retired Midwife)
Christina SpyratouSpecialist Registrar in Urology 
Dr Anne Catherine PriestleyRetired NHS GP MB BS, MRCP (UK).
Julia JacquesStaff nurse 
Catherine TurnerChartered Physiotherapist
Lucia BrunoNursing Associate 
KerryDental Nurse
JuliaRN Adult Nurse
Claire BuchananStaff nurse, DipHE nursing (child)
Rachel SimpsonSenior I MR/CT Radiographer – BSc (Hons) Diagnostic Radiography
Tiziana BertinottiDoctor of TCM, Acupuncture Clinician, BHSc (Acu), BA (Hons), PGCE
HeatherOccupational Therapist 
Jannah van der PolGeneral Practitioner
Tony RippingSenior Mental Health Practitioner (RMN)
Dr Gillian BreeseGeneral Practitioner BSc MB ChB DFFP DTM&H 
Dr Jessica EnglerTrainee GP, MBChB, BSc (Hons)
Sarah WatersPsychotherapist
Damien CominosParamedic
Penny SennerRegistered adult nurse. District nursing
Joanne HillRegistered Nurse, staff nurse NHS 
Hannah JanuszczykPharmacist
Ela BuzaljkoTrainee Nurse Assistant
June TranmerAcupuncturist – member of AAC
Jacqui CragoRadiographer. BAppSc (Medical Imaging)
Carol Fitzroy-BentLead Pharmacy Technician, BTech Pharmaceutical Sciences
Margaret StroudBDS, BSc (Hons)
Karen MooreRegistered Nurse
Joanne LeeDip NT 
Nichola DaviesRMN BSc Mental Health Nursing 
Dr Richard ScreenEmergency Medicine Doctor, MBChB, BSc (Hons)
Diane DoodySocial prescriber 
Helen HardwickSpecialist Nurse Critical Care, Bsc(Hons)Nursing Studies, Advanced Diploma in Psychotherapeutic Counselling
Evphi KalkanteraParkinsons Nurse Specialist 
Allison NichollsRegistered mental health nurse 
Christine CampbellCommunity nurse Degree
Sue CookClinic Director 
Dr Helen McArdleGeneral Practitioner, BSc (Hons) MBChB (Hons) MRCP, MRCGP, DRCOG, DipDerm
Mandy Sparks 
Suzanne Barlow 
Olivia Hene 
Yasmeen IslamSenior Staff Nurse
Fr Giles PinnockLead Hospital Chaplain
David WhiteMBChB retired GP
Emily WhewellPaediatric Nurse
Danielle Jayne LowesParamedic
Alan BairdRetired dentist, BDS
Theresa MounseyRegistered Midwife 
Dave MillardMental health nurse
Dr Azeezah IsaacsDentist BChD
Charles Abduraghmaan Dentist, BChD
Robert LarocheRegistered nurse
Kate HattonNurse Advisor RN, SCPHN
Ioana PelicanGeneral dental practitioner
Dr SaloniConsultant, MBBCh, PhD, BSc
Annabel Acheson-GrayPhysiotherapist in private practice 
Lisa WaddStroke Specialist, SLT BSc 
Tim GreenPhD Biochemist
Paul AscouParamedic
Gabriella HollandStudent of Naturopathic Nutrition
Jane FeeneyChild & Family Psychotherapist, MA psych
Ishah JohnsBand 6 Paediatric Nurse 
Wendy BabbidgeStaff Nurse 
Louise FergusonHealth Visitor – Specialist Community Public Health Nurse
Dr John HarrisonPhD, FDSRCSEng, FRCPath, Retired Consultant Pathologist
Claire E AdamRegistered nurse, BSc (Hons)
AlicjaMSc BioChem, ANutr
Dr John IsaacsMBChB, retired General Practitioner 
Julia HortonAdministrator, NHS trust 
Jonathan BroughtonSurgical care practitioner, registered Nurse BSC MSC
Allan Frederick RogersSenior Occupational Therapist, BSc (Hons)
Andrew WiddringtonClinical lead, sedationist, dental surgeon, BDS PGDip Sed
Jane LameyRetired District Nurse and Practice Nurse.
Helen Mary Hedderman 
Shereena HamiltonMental Health Support Worker 
Justine Millard-CaseRegistered General Nurse 
Julieann CurrieRNLD, RSCN 
Sarah ThorpeParamedic
Christine GristAdult Nurse DipHE
Demetrios Jimmy PellasRegistered nurse, independent Prescriber
Richard House, PhD, CPsycholChartered psychologist (BPS), retired Senior University Lecturer in Psychology (Roehampton) and psychotherapist
Anna DucharmeRetired General Practitioner
Helen AuburnNutritional therapist Dip ION 
Susan BedfordSpecialist Nurse, RGN
Magdalena Stasiak-horkanGeneral Practitioner
Fiona Jones BSc(hons) DipPreSci PGCert Med Ed, FRPharmS, Retired Clinical Pharmacist
Carolyn PoluninIntegrative Psychotherapist MSc in Private Practice
Simona PanaitescuPsychologist
Joyce KillerbyRetired Registered General  Nurse
Dr Ada Nelson-IyeMBChB
Michelle MasonMental Health Nurse RMN
Sheena FraserGeneral Practitioner
Natalie HardyPharmacy Technician NVQ 3 in Pharmacy Services
Mariana Ferreira ds Silva e SousaPhysiotherapist
Kristina ThistlethwaiteDental care professional 
W Gordon BrydonRetired Clinical Scientist PhD
Karen ThompsonStaff Nurse RGN
Nicholas Peter LeeDirector and RGN (OH SCPHN), BN (Hons), BSc (Hons)
Isabella Jane Ruth WatsonSRN SCM (retired)
Vasileios GrigoriouRGN
Miss K Hickenmidwife and licensed acupuncturist. 
Anne RenfrewMB,ChB retired obstetrician/gynaecologist and general practitioner
Simon WilliamsRetired Doctor
Nigel AddisonSpecialist Nurse Practitioner RGN, DipOH, MHSc
Andrew Philip WalkerBDS retired general dental practitioner
Philip AustinAdministration
LisaOccupational therapist 
Alex BakerAdult Nurse
Maria CapriMidwife
Sunita KarnikSpeech & Language Therapist (retired)
John SherwoodPharmacist BPharm MRPHARMS 
AnnaSpecialist Occupational Therapist
Hannah BarsonOccupational Therapist 
Samantha LeesClinical Nurse Specialist RMN
Kelly EdwardsRegistered Children’s Nurse
Joanna HarrisonNeuro Occupational Therapist Grad Diploma
Naomi RiddelCAMHS Consultant Psychiatrist, BSc, MSc, MBBCh, MRCPsych 
Elissa HarperStaff Nurse
Dr Hugh PollardRetired GP. MB BS DRCOG 
Lisa McGrowMidwife
Helen WoodOccupational therapist 
Janina IszattRGN
Anna Marie MacdooNursing
Maria HortonOccupational Therapist (BSc hons)
Wendy Kellettretired graduate nurse
Dr Ricky FreemanBM, General Practitioner 
Maud MalonePodiatrist
Dr Stephen MounceResearch Fellow, Expert in modelling, data science, RT-PCR
Stuart GuyHMHW, M(Res), RN – Lecturer in Nursing
Andrea HalewoodPsychotherapist, BACP
Dr Ross WorthingtonBM BCh retired General Practitioner
Dr Miles DavidsonMBChB,  General Practitioner  PCN Vaccination Lead
Dr Stuart MorganGeneral Practitioner, MBBS
Mr Colin PetherickFDS, MBBCh, Oral Surgeon 
Sandra Marks SRN SCM RHV, Rtd Health Visitor
Fiona MurdochPSA registered Acupuncturist
Anne JebbChartered Physiotherapist
Luke JezephNutritional Therapist BANT CNHC Dip CNM
Roger Meacock BVSc MRCVSVeterinarian and human practitioner
Sarah SilverLevel II Health & Nutrition
Nicola MasseyNutritional Consultant 
Damien Bush MRCVSDirector, Downs Veterinary Practice Ltd. RCVS Recignised Advanced Practitioner Small Animal Surgery
Claire WainwrightSenior Biomedical Scientist (retired)
Rosemary PoppittRegistered Nurse, Registered Midwife, BA Hons (retired)
Ann MillsRetired nurse 
Poppy BagleyRegistered Children’s Nurse
Dr Aileen O’Kane 
David PhillipsDentist,BDS Wales 1986
Millicent Rose MairsHealthcare Assistant
G FairlyBN Adult Nursing Oncology 
Dr David Owen YatesGeneral Practitioner
Rowena FelipeCNS for ACS/Angina
Judith HaldenSpeech and language therapist
Mary Jane LauiganOncology research nurse
L MolinaPaediatric Coordinator/Nurse
Sara DaleHomeopath – Advanced diploma in Homeopathy 
Abigail DrewBiomedical Scientist
Dr Michael Russell EvansMB ChB (Bristol) General Practitioner 
Amanda HenningPractice Nurse
Susannah RobinsonMBBS, BSc, MRCP, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Any additional UK health professionals are welcome to add their signatures via the link here.


[1] Updated analysis of deaths in males 15-19 years of age – HART (hartgroup.org)

Letter to UK health authorities, re: 6 month to 4 years Covid vaccines

Dr June Raine, CEO MHRA
Professor Lim Wei Shen, Chairman JCVI COVID-19 vaccines sub-committee
Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Officer
Dr Jenny Harries, CEO, UKHSA
Hon.Sajid Javid, MP, Secretary of State for Health & Social Care

30th June 2022

Dear Dr Raine,

Re: Covid-19 vaccines for 6 months to 4 years age group

We are writing to you urgently concerning the announcement that the FDA has granted an Emergency Use Authorisation for both Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines in preschool children.

We would urge you to consider very carefully the move to vaccinate ever younger and younger children against SARS-CoV-2, despite the gradual but significant reducing virulence of successive variants, the increasing evidence of rapidly waning vaccine efficacy, the increasing concerns over long-term vaccine harms, and the knowledge that the vast majority of this young age group have already been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 repeatedly and have demonstrably effective immunity. Thus, the balance of benefit and risk which supported the rollout of mRNA vaccines to the elderly and vulnerable in 2021, is totally inappropriate for small children in 2022. 

We also strongly challenge the addition of Covid-19 vaccination into the routine child immunisation programme,[i]despite no demonstrated clinical need, known and unknown risks (see below) and the fact that these vaccines still have only conditional marketing authorisation.

It is noteworthy that the Pfizer documentation[ii] presented to the FDA has huge gaps in the evidence provided: 

  • The protocol was changed mid-trial. The original 2-dose schedule exhibited poor immunogenicity with efficacy far below the required standard. A third dose was added by which time many of the original placebo recipients had been vaccinated.  
  • There was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and vaccinated groups in either the 6–23-month age group or the 2-4-year-olds even after the third dose. Astonishingly the results were based on just three participants in the younger age group (1 vaccinated and 2 placebo) and just seven participants in the older 2–4-year-olds (2 vaccinated and 5 placebo).   Indeed, for the younger age the confidence intervals ranged from minus 367% to plus 99%. The manufacturer stated that the numbers were too low to draw any confident conclusions. Moreover, these limited numbers come only from children infected more than 7 days after the third dose. 
  • Over the whole time period from the first dose onwards (see page 39 Tables 19 & 20), there were a total of 225 infected children in the vaccinated arm and 150 in the placebo arm, giving a calculated vaccine efficacy of only 25% (14% for the 6-23 months, and 33% for 2-4s).  
  • The additional immunogenicity studies against Omicron, requested by the FDA, only involved a total of 66 children tested one month after the third dose (see page 35).   

It is incomprehensible that the FDA considered that this represents sufficient evidence on which to base a decision to vaccinate healthy children.  When it comes to safety, the data is even thinner: only 1057 children, some already unblinded, were followed for just 2 months. It is noteworthy that Sweden and Norway are not recommending the vaccine for 5-11s and Holland is not recommending it for children who have already had Covid-19. The director of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority stated recently that with what is now known, the decision to vaccinate children was a mistake.[iii]

We summarise below the overwhelming arguments against this vaccination.

A.  Extremely low risk from Covid-19 to young children

  • In the whole of 2020 and 2021, not a single child aged 1-9 died where Covid-19 was the sole diagnosis on the death certificate, according to ONS data.[iv]
  • A detailed study in England from 1st March 2020 to 1st March 2021 found only 6 children under 18 years died with no comorbidities. There were no deaths aged 1-4 years.[v]
  • Children clear the virus more easily than adults.[vi]
  • Children mount effective, robust, and sustained immune responses.[vii]
  • Since the arrival of the Omicron variant, infections have been generally much milder. That is also true for unvaccinated under 5s.[viii]
  • By June 2022 it is now estimated that 89% of 1-4-year-olds had already had SARS-CoV-2 infection.[ix]
  • Recent data from Israel shows excellent long-lasting immunity following infection in children, especially in 5-11s.[x]

B.  Poor vaccine efficacy 

  • In adults it has become apparent that vaccine efficacy wanes steadily over time, necessitating boosters at regular intervals. Specifically, vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly against the latest Omicron variants. 
  • In children vaccine efficacy has waned more rapidly in 5-11s than in 12-17s, possibly related to the lower dose used in the paediatric formulation. One study from New York showed efficacy against Omicron falling to only 12% by 4-5 weeks and to negative values by 5-6 weeks post second dose.[xi] 
  • In the Pfizer 0-4s trial,1 the efficacy after two doses fell to negative values, necessitating a change to the trial protocol. After a third dose there was a suggestion of efficacy from 7-30 days but there is no data beyond 30 days to see how quickly this will wane. 

C. Potential harms of Covid-19 vaccines for children

  • There has been great concern about myocarditis in adolescents and young adults, especially in males after the second dose, estimated at 1/2600 in active post marketing surveillance in Hong Kong.[xii] The emerging evidence of persistent cardiac abnormalities[xiii] in adolescents with post mRNA vaccine myopericarditis, as demonstrated by cardiac MRI at 3-8 months follow up, suggests this is far from ‘mild and shot-lived’.  The potential for longer term effects requires further study and calls for the strictest application of the precautionary principle in respect of the youngest and most vulnerable children.
  • Although post-vaccination myocarditis appears to be less common in 5-11-year-olds than older children, it is, none-the-less, increased over baseline.[xiv] 
  • In the Pfizer study 50% of vaccinated children had systemic adverse events, including irritability and fever. Diagnosis of myocarditis is much more difficult in younger children.[xv]  No troponin levels or ECG studies were documented. Even a vaccinated child in the trial, hospitalised with fever, calf pain and a raised CPK, had no report of D-dimers, antiplatelet antibodies or troponin levels.
  • In Pfizer’s 5-11s post-authorisation conditions, they are required to conduct studies looking for myocarditis and are not due to report results until 2027.
  • Of equal concern are, as yet unknown, negative effects on the immune system. In the 0-4s trial, only 7 children were described as having ‘severe’ Covid-19 – 6 vaccinated and 1 given placebo. Similarly, for the 12 children with recurrent episodes of infection, 10 were vaccinated against only 2 who received placebo. These are all tiny figures and much too small to rule out any adverse impact such as antibody dependant enhancement (ADE)[xvi]  and other impacts on the immune system.
  • Also unanswered is the question of Original Antigenic Sin.[xvii]  It is of note that in a large Israeli study, those infected after vaccination had poorer cover than those vaccinated after infection.[xviii]  In the Moderna trial, N antibodies were seen in only 40% of those infected after vaccination, compared to 93% of those infected after placebo.[xix] 
  • There is evidence of vaccine-induced disruption of both innate and adaptive[xx],[xxi] immune responses. The possibility of developing an impaired immune function would be disastrous for children, who have the most competent innate immunity, which by now has been effectively trained by the circulating virus.
  • Totally unknown is whether there will be any adverse effect on T-cell function leading to an increase in cancers.[xxii] 
  • Also, in terms of reproductive function, limited animal biodistribution studies showed lipid nanoparticles concentrate in ovaries and testes.[xxiii]  Adult sperm donors have showed a reduction in sperm counts particularly of motile sperm, falling by 3 months post-vaccination and remaining depressed at 4-5 months.[xxiv] 
  • Even for adults, concerns are rising that serious adverse events are in excess of hospitalisations from Covid-19.[xxv]

D. Informed consent

  • For 5-11s, the JCVI, in recommending a ‘non-urgent offer’ of vaccination, specifically noted the importance of fully informed consent with no coercion.[xxvi]
  • With the low uptake in this age group, the presence of ‘therapy dogs’,[xxvii] advertisements including superhero images[xxviii] and information about child vaccination protecting friends and family, all clearly run contrary to the concept of consent, fully informed and freely given.[xxix] 
  • The complete omission of information explaining to the public the different and novel technology used in Covid-19 vaccines compared to standard vaccines, and the failure to inform of the lack of any long-term safety data, borders on misinformation.[xxx]

E. Effect on public confidence 

  • Vaccines against much more serious diseases, such as polio and measles, need to be prioritised.[xxxi]  Pushing an unnecessary and novel, gene-based vaccine onto young children risks seriously undermining parental confidence in the whole immunisation programme. 
  • The poor quality of the data presented by Pfizer risks bringing the pharmaceutical industry into disrepute and the regulators if this product is authorised.

In summary, young healthy children are at minimal risk from Covid-19, especially since the arrival of the Omicron variant.  Most have been repeatedly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 virus, yet have remained well, or have had short, mild illness. As detailed above, the vaccines are of brief efficacy, have known short- to medium-term risks and unknown long-term safety. Data for clinically useful efficacy in small children are scant or absent.  In older children, for whom they are already licensed, they have been promoted via ethically dubious schemes to the potential detriment of other, and vital, parts of the childhood vaccination programme.

For a tiny minority of children for whom the potential for benefit clearly and unequivocally outweighed the potential for harm, vaccination could have been facilitated by restrictive licences.  Whether following the precautionary principle or the instruction to First Do No Harm, such vaccines have no place in a routine childhood immunisation programme.  

Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Principal, Institute for

  Cancer Vaccines & Immunotherapy (ICVI)

Prof Anthony Fryer, PhD, FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University 

Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Retired Professor of Medical Microbiology, UEA

Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon 

Lord Moonie,  MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-

  secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine

Dr Abby Astle, MA(Cantab), MBBChir, GP Principal, GP Trainer, GP Examiner

Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner

Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, Retired Pharmaceutical Physician

Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist

Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner

Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine

  practitioner 

Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner

Julie Coffey, MBChB, General Practitioner 

John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner, retired

Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant Ophthalmologist

James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health

Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist

Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D

Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (hons), DipPharmMed

Dr Elizabeth Evans, MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor

Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD, retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals and retired Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery SmithKline Beecham 

Dr Simon Fox, BSc, BMBCh, FRCP, Consultant in Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine

Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of

  medicine 

David Halpin, MB BS FRCS, Orthopaedic and trauma surgeon (retired)     

Dr Renée Hoenderkampf, General Practitioner

Dr Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired

Dr Steve James, Consultant Intensive Care 

Dr Keith Johnson, BA, DPhil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing

Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician

Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior Lecturer in Biomedical Sciences

Dr Charles Lane, MA, DPhil, Molecular Biologist

Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Molecular Biologist

Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow 

Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath

Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.

Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MBBS, MD, FRCP, Consultant physician, retired

Ahmad K Malik FRCS (Tr & Orth) Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Kulvinder Singh Manik, MBBS, General Practitioner

Dr Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr S McBride, BSc(Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical

  Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP(Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics

Mr Ian McDermott, MBBS, MS, FRCS(Tr&Orth), FFSEM(UK), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine

Dr Scott Mitchell, MBChB, MRCS, Emergency Medicine Physician

Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology

Dr David Morris, MBChB, MRCP(UK), General Practitioner

Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire

Dr Alice Murkies, MD FRACGP MBBS, General Practitioner

Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy

Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, retired GP and Naturopathic Physician

Dr Rachel Nicholl, PhD, Medical researcher

Sue Parker Hall, certified transactional analyst (CTA, psychotherapy); MSc (Counselling & 

  Supervision) MBACP (senior accredited practitioner); EMDR practitioner, Psychotherapist

Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause specialist 

Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow,

  formerly physician specialising in cardiology

Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, BSc (hons), DFRSH, DCP (Ireland), DRCOG, DipOccMed, 

 MRCGP, General Practitioner

Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology

Dr Johanna Reilly, MBBS, General Practitioner

Jessica Righart, MSc, MIBMS, Senior Critical Care Scientist

Mr Angus Robertson, BSc, MB ChB, FRCSEd (Tr & Orth), Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Dr Jessica Robinson, BSc(Hons), MBBS, MRCPsych, MFHom, Psychiatrist and Integrative

 Medicine Doctor

Dr Jon Rogers, MB ChB (Bristol), Retired General Practitioner

Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon 

Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease

 Surveillance Centre Wales

Sorrel Scott, Grad Dip Phys, Specialist Physiotherapist in Neurology, 30 years in NHS

Dr Rohaan Seth, BSc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner

Dr Gary Sidley, retired NHS Consultant Clinical Psychologist

Dr Annabel Smart, MBBS, retired General Practitioner

Natalie Stephenson, BSc (Hons) Paediatric Audiologist 

Dr Zenobia Storah, MA (Oxon), Dip Psych, DClinPsy, Senior Clinical Psychologist (Child and

  Adolescent)

Dr Julian Tompkinson, MBChB MRCGP, General Practitioner GP trainer PCME

Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor

Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician

Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist

Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology

Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner

Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon

Dr Damian Wilde, PhD (Chartered) Specialist Clinical Psychologist

Dr Damian Wilde, PhD, (Chartered) Specialist Clinical Psychologist

Dr Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor

    and others …..


[i] NHS vaccinations and when to have them. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/vaccinations/nhs-vaccinations-and-when-to-have-them/

[ii] EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 6 months through 4 years of age. Submitted to the FDA 15/06/2022. https://www.fda.gov/media/159195/download

[iii] Denmark admits – in retrospect we didn’t get much out of vaccinating the children. Report from a press conference 27-06-2022. https://europe-cities.com/2022/06/27/denmark-admits-in-retrospect-we-did-not-get-much-out-of-vaccinating-the-children/

[iv] COVID-19 Deaths and Autopsies Feb 2020 to Dec 2021, Table 1: Number of Deaths Where COVID-19 Was the Only Cause Mentioned on the Death Certificate, 1 February 2020 to 31 December 2021, by Sex and Age Group, England and Wales, Jan. 17, 2022, Office for National Statisticshttps://www.ons.gov.uk/aboutus/transparencyandgovernance/freedomofinformationfoi/covid19deathsandautopsiesfeb2020todec2021

[v] Smith C, Odd D, Harwood R et al. Deaths in Children and Young People in England following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first pandemic year: a national study using linked mandatory child death reporting data. Nature Medicine 28 (2022): 185–192,https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-021-01578-1.pdf

[vi] Kevin J. Selva, Carolien E. van de Sandt, Melissa M. Lemke, et al., Systems Serology Detects Functionally Distinct Coronavirus Antibody Features in Children and ElderlyNature Communications 12, no. 2037 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22236-7.

[vii] Alexander C. Dowell, Megan S. Butler, Elizabeth Jinks, et al., “Children Develop Robust and Sustained Cross-Reactive Spike-Specific Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection,” Nat Immunol 23 (2022): 40–49, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-021-01089-8

[viii] Wang L, Berger NA, Kaelber DC, Davis PB, Volkow ND, Xu R. COVID infection severity in children under 5 years old before and after Omicron emergence in the US. Preprint. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.12.22269179v1.full.pdf

[ix] MRC Biostatistics Unit. Report on Nowcasting and Forecasting – 23rd June 2022. https://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/now-casting/nowcasting-and-forecasting-23rd-June-2022/

[x] Patalon T & Maccabi KS. Naturally-acquired Immunity Dynamics against SARS-CoV-2 in Children and Adolescents. Preprint21/06/2022. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.06.20.22276650v1

[xi] Dorabawila V, Hoefer D, Bauer UE et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine among children 5-11 and 12-17 years in New York after the Emergence of the Omicron Variant. Preprint 28/02/2022. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271454v1.full-text

[xii] Chua GT, KWan MYW, Chui CSL et al. Epidemiology of Acute Myocarditis/Pericarditis in Hong Kong Adolescents Following Comirnaty Vaccination. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 394-396. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8767823/

[xiii] Schauer J, Buddhe S, Gulhabe A et al. Persistent Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in a Cohort of Adolescents with Post-Coronavirus Disease 2019 mRNA Vaccine Myopericarditis. J Pediatr 2022; 245: 233-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.03.032

[xiv] Su JR. COVID-19 vaccine safety updates: Primary series in children and adolescents ages 5–11 and 12–15 years, and booster doses in adolescents ages 16–24 years. ACIP meeting 05-01-2022. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2022-01-05/02-COVID-Su-508.pdf

[xv] Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Health Library. Myocarditis in Children. Myocarditis in Children | Symptoms, Causes, Treatment & Prognosis (cincinnatichildrens.org)

[xvi] Yahi N, Chahinian H, Fantini J. Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?. J Infect. 2021;83(5):607-635. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8351274/ 

[xvii] Brown EL, Essigmann HT. Original Antigenic Sin: the Downside of Immunological Memory and Implications for COVID-19. mSphere 2021; 6(2): e00056-21. ttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8546681/

[xviii] Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM et al. Protection and waning of natural and hybrid COVID-19 immunity. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2201-12. https://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa2118946?articleTools=true

[xix] Follmann D, Janes HE, Buhule OD et al. Anti-nucleocapsid antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection in the blinded phase of the mRNA-1273 Covid-19 vaccine efficacy clinical trial. Preprint 19-04-2022. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936v1.full

[xx] Föhse FK, Geckin B, Overheul GJ et al. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and 2 innate immune responses. Preprint 06-05-2021. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.03.21256520

[xxi] Seneff S, Nigh G, Kyriakopoulos AM, McCullough PA. Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs. Food and Chemical Toxicology 2022; 164:113008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2022.113008

[xxii] Singh N, Bharara Singh A. S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study. Transl Oncol. 2020;13(10):100814. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7324311/

[xxiii] Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf. https://www.naturalnews.com/files/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf

[xxiv] Gat I,Kedem A, Dviri M et al. Covid-19 Vaccination BNT162b2 Temporarily Impairs Semen Concentration and Total Motile Count among Semen Donors. Andrology 2022;1–7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/andr.13209

[xxv] Fraiman J, Erviti J, Jones M, Greenland S, Whelan P, Kaplan RM, Doshi P. Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials. Preprint 23-06-2022. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4125239

[xxvi] JCVI statement on vaccination of children aged 5 to 11 years old. 16-02-2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jcvi-update-on-advice-for-covid-19-vaccination-of-children-aged-5-to-11/jcvi-statement-on-vaccination-of-children-aged-5-to-11-years-old

[xxvii] Therapy dogs comfort children during Covid jabs. BBC News. 27-02-2022. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-60529628

[xxviii] Evans E. “Calling All Superhero Kids”: The Unethical Targeting of Young Children by the NHS with COVID-19 Vaccine Adverts. The Daily Sceptic 19-06-2022. https://dailysceptic.org/archive/calling-all-superhero-kids-the-unethical-targeting-of-young-children-by-the-nhs-with-covid-19-vaccine-adverts/

[xxix] NHS South East London Clinical Commissioning Group. FAQs – Vaccinating 5 to 11 year olds.  https://selondonccg.nhs.uk/what-we-do/covid-19/covid-19-vaccine/faqs/faqs-vaccinating-5-to-11-year-olds/

[xxx] What is in the vaccine and how does it work? | NHS. 30-04-2021. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgtWpwkS9u4&list=PLnhASgDToTktp2HIjdyeo2fsI6Agcn1ul&index=6

[xxxi] Boyd C. Polio may be spreading in Britain for first time in 40 YEARS. Mail Online 23-06-2022. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10938639/Polio-spreading-UK-time-40-years-Evolved-version-virus-London-sewage.html

CCVAG

JCVI locks down as CCVAC rings alarm bell on covid vaccinations

A panel of British professors, doctors and medical experts from the Children’s Covid Advisory Group (CCVAC) has presented new evidence about the unfavourable risk-benefit balance of the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine for children. 

At the official launch of the CCVAC at an event in London, the panel revealed:

  • An unexplained rise in deaths of teenage boys correlating with Pfizer vaccine roll-out.
  • Risk-benefit of Pfizer vaccination is many times worse for children.
  • Vaccinating the youth increases chances of vaccine-resistant variants, increasing the risk for elderly and vulnerable.

The evidence was presented at 4pm yesterday, after the JCVI refused to accept delivery from CCVAC chair Dr Ros Jones of the new evidence, compiled from official sources in the UK and internationally.

Health Security Agency locks down

Just prior to the press conference, four members of the Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council (CCVAC) visited the UKHSA headquarters of the JCVI in London, pre-agreed the day before by the UKHSA, to hand-deliver a letter written by 92 doctors, professors and scientists and co-signed by more than 700 healthcare professionals. 

On arrival at the main entrance, the building that also houses the UK’s Health Security Agency, went into lockdown and the four doctors were denied access to the main reception for 40 minutes, along with all other visitors to the public building that spans 22 London postal addresses.

The letter was subsequently handed over to a security manager in the street outside the UKHSA by an intermediary. 

The letter calls for a pause to the roll-out for children and an urgent investigation into new, concerning safety signals. 

Dr Ros Jones, retired Consultant Paediatrician, said, “When assessing whether to give any medical intervention to children, it’s crucial to ensure that the benefit to the recipient clearly outweighs the risks. In this case, the latest evidence strongly suggests the risks for children may be greater than any possible benefit. On top of this, we do not yet know the long-term implications of the covid vaccinations for children’s immune function or their overall health.”

Professor David Livermore, Professor of Medical Microbiology at East Anglia University, said, “Having worked as Director of Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring for Public Health England for many years, the parallels with antibiotic resistance are clear. Using antibiotics when they are not needed increases the risk of antibiotic resistant strains spreading, for it gives them an advantage. The same risk applies with viruses and antibodies.

“Most of the young have been infected now. That is the best route to robust, lasting immunity for children, who have minimal risk of severe COVID. Vaccines give briefer, narrower, protection and are tailored to the Wuhan strain; they are leaky against omicron already. Using them where they aren’t needed is just encouraging the virus to evolve further, and unpredictably.”

Professor Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St George’s, University of London, said, “Whilst the vaccination for the initial variants clearly helped older and at risk patients, it is clear that young people have very effective T-cell responses (which wane in older patients), but which are very effective in protecting young people and children with the Omicron variant, giving minimum disease and very good immunity. The immunity is not only superior to any of the vaccines (with the majority of young people already exposed to natural infection) but there is clear evidence that vaccines in young adults and children are causing significant side effects with myocarditis occurring many more times than natural infection. It cannot therefore be justified to expose them to a vaccine that clearly gives unacceptable side effects in the short run and could be associated with significant long term harm.”

Dr Clare Craig, Diagnostic Pathologist said, “when there is no benefit to the children being vaccinated it is important to thoroughly investigate any signals of harm. There is a concerning signal of raised non-covid mortality in young men, of unknown cause, which needs investigating. Our experience of harm from Pandemrix vaccine after swine flu in 2009 should teach us that evidence of harm can take years to accumulate and apparently minor signals should not be ignored.”

Dr Elizabeth Evans, Director of the UK Medical Freedom Alliance discussed the ethics of giving Covid vaccines to children and highlighted the importance of the Hippocratic Oath to “First do no harm”.  She said,

 “The possibility of detrimental health effects coming to light after a few years is plausible and this is why the vaccine manufacturers requested – and were – granted full immunity from future side-effects.    

“If this risk is significant enough for the manufacturers to be unwilling to accept economic risk, then we cannot allow our children to take the same health risk with their long-term health, especially when, for children, the benefits of doing so appear to be highly speculative.”

About the CCVAC

The Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council is a panel of British scientists, doctors and medical experts, including several of the country’s leading professors in medicine, microbiology and risk, as well as specialists in public health, emergency medicine, paediatrics, infectious disease and primary care. 

Here is the data on child Pfizer death. It is chilling.

An analysis of ONS data has shown that children are 52 times more likely to die after a covid shot than ‘unvaccinated’ children. In addition, the data, shows that the risk increases rapidly for younger children, and for second doses.

According to an analysis by the Daily Expose, in the first 10 months of last year, Pfizer vaccinated teenagers between 15-19 years old were 200% more likely to die than untreated teenagers. Meanwhile, vaccinated children between 10-14 years old were 1,000% more likely to die than those children who did have a covid vaccination.

In addition, the analysis of the government’s official data (which you can read in full here) shows that the second vaccine shot radically increases the chances of death. After the second shot, the risk rises to 300% for the older teenagers, and 5,200% for those under 14 years – based on a death rate of 238 per 100,000 person years.

However, even this grossly understates the true risk for several reasons.

The figures include children between 10 and 11 years old, an age group that is not eligible for vaccination in the UK. In addition, deaths within two weeks after vaccination are added to the unvaccinated count, not the vaccinated count, even though about half of all vaccine deaths occur in this period. 

The failure of the mainstream news services to report on this should be shocking, if it did not follow a consistent pattern of ignoring all evidence that would detract from the sale of pharmaceuticals and government policy.

In addition, the Daily Expose’s analysis was in spite of the recalcitrant behaviour of the ONS and obfuscation in its presentation and reporting. According to the Daily Expose, the ONS inadvertently released enough details on deaths along children and adults in its Deaths by Vaccination status dataset. 

Furthermore, the UK government had been sitting on the data for more than a month, allowing children and teenagers to continue to be vaccinated, while secretly adding up the resulting deaths. For a disease that does not kill them.  

Infantile adults are everybody’s problem

It’s a wonderful thing to live in a country where the rules that govern our everyday lives are compatible with good sense and reason.

Most of us have taken that for granted, so we’ve not had to think: what should we do if the rules are irrational or, worse still, downright wrong?

Blind obedience is a virtue, but only for very young children. They know so little about the world and can be a danger to themselves and others. The criteria for a good baby or toddler is basically just that – compliance with adult wishes. 

But absolute obedience stops becoming a virtue pretty quickly. For a toddler it’s fine, but no parent should be happy if their child still unquestioningly obeys them when they are 10. To thrive in the world as a responsible adult, they need to develop judgement, good sense and the courage to act on it in the face of ‘authority’. 

In the modern age, whole societies periodically lapse into this infantile mode.

For this to happen, the groundwork must be laid: adults need a father figure. For a long-time this was God and religion, but these days of course, it’s the State. Outsourcing our personal responsibilities to the State begins when we vote for strength in the face of external threats; when we choose to display our ‘kindness’, not through acts of personal charity and sacrifice, but by paying more tax. Soon, people begin to identify their moral worth by how they vote rather than how they act in the world. Immolation to the State becomes a proxy for morality. 

And so adults cease to be ‘consenting.’ They become – not children even – but infants, toddlers. Meanwhile, the State becomes ‘tyrannical father’ and ‘devouring mother’. 

It’s untenable though, because, in a very real sense, there is no such thing as a ‘State’. Yes, there are instruments and machineries of power. But they are just wielded by other toddlers. If the State is the people, and the people are infantilised, then adult supervision is an illusion. No government or legal system, however august or ancient, can uphold moral rights when presided over by grown-up infants. In such a situation, reason gives way to the moral imperative of the creche: fear, jealousy and greed.  

An inevitable consequence of adults behaving as children is that children must be treated as adults. It is therefore logical that they are given autonomy and decision-making power over whether to irrevocably change their hormones and sex, for example, or their genetic make-up via a novel drug. 

During the French Revolution, there was a popular saying. “Revolutions devour their children.” It was not just a metaphor. Many children were executed by the French revolutionary state, and many more ‘unofficially’ massacred. (Children can be a real threat to ideologies, you know.) Infantile societies destroy their children too. It begins by removing their innocence, then their childhood, and if it persists, it ends in blood. 

I’m reminded of those buffoons at international football matches and political shindigs last summer while tens of thousands of perfectly healthy children were locked at home ‘isolating’. Their parents and teachers were all following the rules and held their heads up in society for doing so. 

July 2021: their children were locked in their bedrooms.

And now we are entering, not the endgame, but perhaps the Squidgame. A risky pharmaceutical intervention to alter children’s genes. An unconscionable act with no plausible medical justification. It simply fulfils a deep psychological need among infantilised adults: to demonstrate State allegiance through child sacrifice. And let’s not forget, there’s the added kicker of being able to vacation abroad.

Make no mistake, every act of mindless compliance to nonsensical rules that every adult makes, trickles and then floods down on to children. 

Every time you wear a mask, even though you know its efficacy has no basis in empiricism.

Every time you track-and-trace.

Every time you nod along to some virtue-signalling covid conversation.

Every time you submit your body to medical coercion, you deny to all children the freedoms you were born with and that our grandparents’ generation fought and died to protect.

You deny them the freedom to act out of conscience and personal responsibility, and the freedom to say ‘no’. 

It’s not the State. There is no State. It’s me, and it’s you. 

We are the problem. 

Our compliance is violence.

________________________________________________

Ross Butler is founder of the Children’s Union

 

British Heart Foundation’s graphic advert prompts ‘please explain’

Monday, 17th January 2022

Dr Charmaine Griffiths

CEO, British Heart Foundation

Dear Charmaine,

Re:  Questions concerning your TV advert and website

A number of our supporters asked me to get in touch with you, having seen your advert on television. 

I watched the full version, called ‘This is science’, on your website. The main character is Sophie, a teenager who collapses on a soccer pitch, as her mother screams her name, and she drops to the floor, lifeless eyes rolling back. It’s shocking stuff.

Our followers would like to know:

What was the impetus behind focusing on children for this major campaign?

Presumably you are signalling that such events are not uncommon. But of course, that’s only true of 2021. Your advert normalises children having sudden, serious heart conditions, when it is ‘normal’ only in the context of the unprecedented covid vaccine rollout to young people. As you must know, while covid poses healthy children no statistically measurable risk, these vaccines are much more dangerous for them than for adults.

Your advert is called: ‘This is science’. But the only science on your coronavirus web pages is psychological manipulation. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nZyiEfxi20

It talks of covid leading to heart problems, without mentioning that the covid spike that causes these complications is also in the vaccines but in vastly greater quantities, which is why kids weren’t dropping on football pitches during the 2020 pandemic, but only after the vaccine roll out. 

You are pushing everyone to get double jabbed. “Everyone”, it says. Is this your medical advice, Dr Griffiths? Does “everyone” include children?

Do you see the invidious position you have placed the British Heart Foundation in? 

You are raising funds to cure people’s heart conditions, while pushing the sale of the very drugs that cause the heart conditions in the first place. You are turning the British Heart Foundation into a racket. 

I can only think that you and Professor Sir Nilesh Samani have sleep-walked into a nightmare, and you are struggling to wake up. On behalf of every child and young person whose heart and life you will ruin, we are ringing the alarm bell. 

Wake up, get up, and start doing your job.

Yours sincerely,

Ross Butler

Founder, The Children’s Union

It has never been so easy to save a child’s life. Act now

The vaccinators are in our schools. The time to act is right now. You can do three things right now.

  1. Inform headteachers of ongoing legal challenge

It’s not been covered in the media, but the law courts have put a huge dent in the government’s child vaccination plans and undermined its ethical basis. 

At a high court hearing in early October, an injunction was sought to pause the mass rollout of Covid vaccinations for healthy children aged between 12 to 16 years.

High Court judge, Mr Justice Jay, accepted that there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the mass vaccination of healthy children may be unlawful. 

Since the jabs don’t prevent infection or transmission, the government bench failed to offer any rational or plausible basis for the policy. However, given the political shock that stopping the roll out would cause, they have been granted 11 days to prepare better evidence. In the meantime, most Britain’s school children will be offered the chance to irreversibly join this dangerous and unnecessary experiment. 

Safer to wait have written this letter that you can send to the head teachers in your area, explaining their moral and legal liability in the face of this development. Download it, sign and send:  

https://t.co/17z9RUduWq?amp=1

2. NHS style consent form – leaflet drop

We have been sent this excellent consent form which you can print out and distribute in your local area.

Children are being vaccinated now, and they are under great peer and authoritative pressure. They need something in their hands to use as a last line of defence. This could be it. 

3. Cover letter

If you wish, you could use this cover letter to provide some context and further information about the risks and supposed benefits of child vaccination.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSNGHZTuSd6c_EeqNTzHNquiSXr7eEyQaiALKYWteOHhTdPeRpDdX1MmIsyStvqzdTxC3Vh1Wx5CqWm/pub

The message

If you are going to be active, you may be put on the spot, and asked why you don’t think children should be vaccinated.

There are so many reasons not to vaccinate children it can be difficult to know where to begin in the heat of the moment.

Our analysis of people’s motivations suggests that emphasising people’s personal risk is not effective on its own. It must be couple with the fact that the jab will not actually do any good, since they were not designed to prevent transmission.

The pharmaceutical companies have tried to fudge this by advertising relative risk reductions of 99%. However, the standard measure of efficacy is absolute risk reduction, and these are so small as to be within the margin of statistical error.

In other words, there is no discernible benefit.

The cruellest thing a child could do to their parents is to risk their life, completely unnecessarily.

I would like to thank you all in advance. We can’t save everyone. So work on that basis that you can prevent one family from having their lives shattered.

Good luck.

Whitty

Open letter to Chris Whitty on his ‘impact assessment’ of vaccinating teens

Read our open letter to Professor Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer, regarding the government’s request for him to consider vaccinating 12-15 year olds, despite the JCVI’s opposition.

—————————–

Professor Chris Whitty 
Chief Medical Officer
HM Government
By email: c.whitty@nhs.net

Dear Chris,

Re:  ‘Chief medical officers to consider vaccinating people [sic] aged 12 to 15 following JCVI advice’

After so many untested non-medical interventions on our children, the government finally wants an impact assessment. 

Government ministers want you, Chris, to consider “the wider impacts” of not giving children the Covid treatment, specifically:

‘the impact on schools and young people’s education, which has been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic.’

You see the problem, I’m sure. The pandemic didn’t close schools. The government did. As such, they are asking you to respond, not to a genuine enquiry, but to a threat: if you don’t sanction this risky medical intervention, our non-medical intervention may hurt children even more.

The JCVI held the line last week. The government-convened panel of experts refused to sanction the covid treatment for children. Under great political pressure to give it the green light, they had to consider covid, long covid, short term health impacts like myocarditis, the incidence of death following vaccination, the long-term health impacts on children that have their whole lives ahead of them. And they said, no. Don’t do it. 

So now, unable to justify this medical intervention on medical grounds, the government wants you to justify it on the grounds of reactive policy. But policy isn’t inevitable. They set it. They don’t really want an impact assessment, Chris. They want a parody of one, with your signature beneath it. 

Let’s be clear on your task. The government has asked you to weigh-up two false and unnecessary alternatives; and to tell them which will be the least effective at hurting, maiming and killing children. They will then implement one of them.

You have another option, Chris. You can just say no. None of the above. 

Children don’t have a choice here. And their parents won’t really have one. Only you do.

We have wanted an impact assessment on school closures since March 2020. But we are now in a position where, if such an assessment were conducted, it would be used as an excuse to vaccinate children against medical advice. The truth has been weaponised. That’s what happens you make concessions against logic in the name of political expediency. You undo 300 years of scientific progress.

Don’t be a part of it, Chris. 

Say “none of the above”. 

Yours sincerely,

A picture containing text

Description automatically generated

Ross Butler                

Founder 

The casual pathology of Professor Lim

He wouldn’t have got away with it in 2020. 

When Professor Wei Shen Lim, chairman of the JCVI’s Covid-19 sub-committee, announced last week that the Pfizer vaccine was to be ‘offered’ to all 16- and 17-year-olds, with 12-year-olds next, the UK gave a kind of collective shrug. 

Such is our fatigue, government scientists could make lederhosen mandatory and people would just react based on the political camp they’ve adopted (‘follow the science’ or ‘follow the science-money’).

Well, it’s time to wake up and grow up, because things don’t always just work out, and they are talking about our children.  

This vaccination programme may be a success, but it also has a life of its own, and it is being expanded at a furious rate without even the pretence of diligence, questioning or debate from the media or opposition parties. Scientific inquiry has been entirely censored, with the world’s formerly leading virologists and epidemiologists no-platformed. Since the word ‘science’ means precisely that process of open inquiry, then whatever the JCVI are doing, it is not what the lab-coat theatre suggests. 

However, the very fact Professor Lim’s press conference lacked any precision, rigour or coherence was actually very revealing.

We are now passed the point where the UK’s political advisers in lab coats are even pretending this is about science. (At one point, Lim actually laughed as he concluded a rambling answer with, ‘I hope that’s clear,’ when it was clearly a deflection.)

We have analysed Professor Lim’s explanations in search of a grain of logic or evidence for rushing out this vaccine to children. You can make up your own mind.

  • “Risk from covid”

In his first point, he chose to gloss over the crucial matter of the frequency and severity with which children get covid, by deferring to the regulator’s casual opening comments. Rather an important point, you’d think, when you are effectively mandating (through coercion) an entirely new gene therapy for children. 

In fact, we know that there is zero statistical basis on which to say that children are at any risk at all from covid. Of the tiny yet tragic handful of children that have died with covid (as with all age groups, the data does not determine that they died from covid), all of them had serious existing conditions, such as leukaemia, and many were already in hospital with these, prior to infection. In the context of millions of children, the number is far, far below the level at which any determination of risk can be made. When it comes to children and covid, the word ‘risk’, in the sense of measurable statistics (which is how scientists use it) is simply inapplicable. Lim knows this of course, which is why he won’t speak about it.

  • “Frequency of severe reaction to Pfizer vaccine”

Professor Lim next asserted that the frequency of severe reactions from the vaccine are “extremely rare or very rare” for bad outcomes. There is a big difference between ‘extremely’ and ‘very’ rare. Extremely rare means 1 in 100,000. Very rare means 1 in 10,000. And in fact, in the JCVI’s statement in July on vaccinating children, it said that the side effects were ‘rare but serious’. Rare means one in a thousand. 

In other words, if we vaccinate all children in this country, there could be as many as 10,000 children suffering serious side effects from a vaccine that was never going to do them any harm. The Pfizer trials on children in the US show that ‘serious’ incidents include heart inflammation and heart failure, that in several cases resulted in a healthy child dying within days (yes many children were killed earlier this year from the Pfizer shot during the rushed US trials, you can read about them on the US government’s official site here – search for Pfizer BioNTech Covid-19, by age.)

As far as we can determine, the risk from covid from these healthy children was zero.

It’s an interesting thought experiment to see how you can distinguish this programme from that followed by serial-killer Dr Harold Shipman. I’m yet to find any meaningful difference.

Maybe there is a different reading of the risk, and of the numbers. But if that was the case, why didn’t Professor Lim give it? Why hasn’t the JCVI ever given it, despite the many public and private requests from doctors and scientists around the country?  

You may also note what Lim did not say on this topic – that there is no long-term safety data on these vaccines. Most vaccine injuries in any age groups are longer-term effects, but for children this is crucial. And all the more so given that the short-term data has revealed that serious risks are present that were not predicted in the initial trials. They have their whole lives to live. Professor Lim entirely ignored this crucial point, as has the entire covid-vaccine industry. 

  • “Long covid in children”

Professor Lim stated that long covid is ‘only true for a very small proportion’ of children. If this sounds uncharacteristically measured, you should know that on the day of his press conference, Kings College released the most comprehensive study on child ‘long covid’ to-date, which showed that, like many respiratory diseases, covid can cause a lingering headache in children for a few weeks, but that in every case it cleared up within eight weeks. Since the study was going to be the second news item of the evening, Lim had nowhere further to go.

  • “Mental health and educational impact of covid”

Yes, this was actually one of Lim’s killer points. If you can’t work out why it’s nonsense, focus on the words ‘of covid’. 

  • “Health inequality”

Perhaps the most vacuous and dangerous of all Lim’s non-points is his assertion that covid has “disproportionately affected young people”, and that “the effect of the vaccine on reducing healthcare inequalities.” 

What to make of this strange, unscientific series of statements?

Equality has never been a goal of medicine or healthcare. Equality is a goal within the Marxist political ideology, and whatever you think of that, it has never been applied to healthcare outcomes. The goal of healthcare is simply to make people healthy.

If the goal of healthcare is to make people equal, the quickest way to do that is to make everyone dead. If that sounds flippant, then you haven’t thought hard enough about how a society’s moral presuppositions force them down paths that nobody would have intended. 

  • “One dose”

Here’s a strange thing. Lim and his JCVI colleagues aren’t going to give these teenagers both jabs within 3 weeks as some other countries have. They are going to wait to see what happens after the first dose.

You could look on this as relatively prudent. Or you could ask, if the vaccine is so safe, why wouldn’t you just give both? 

The answer lies, of course, in the US Pfizer trials, where a significant proportion of children did not take the second dose, because of ‘adverse effects’, which for some meant they were already dead. 

  • “Parental consent”

Did I not mention this yet? There is no parental consent for 16-year-olds. To be fair, Lim didn’t bother to mention this either. He waited until the first, blatantly planted, question from the BBC, delivered and answered, as an after-thought. Nothing to see here.

  • Why the U-turn.

Perhaps most amazingly (although there’s plenty of competition) this press conference amounted to a colossal U-turn that was barely acknowledged by the attending press. Just two weeks earlier, the JCVI stated that vaccine risks outweighed the benefits for under-18s.

What shocking new data had suddenly emerged? 

Not only was this not forthcoming (and still isn’t) but Lim said they didn’t even have it.

You see, “the evidence isn’t necessarily in the hands of the JCVI. We have spoken to academic partners in other countries,” and the data hasn’t been published. Lim shrugs at this, like, what can you do? 

And the journalists are like, nothing to see here

And that is so true.

What to conclude?

It’s one thing to demonstrate that someone is full of gas. But does that necessarily mean that Lim and the JCVI are acting malevolently? 

I mean, if the broad implications of the above analysis are even half-right, the JCVI would need to be evil or out-of-their minds. And that seems unlikely.

So, despite all of the nonsense they are talking, maybe they just know something we don’t, and for reasons that are unfathomable but that could exist, they just can’t tell us. 

Well, actually, I think that is not so far from the truth. And not in a good way.

Exhibit one

Lim is being paid by Pfizer. I know, this seems really far-fetched. But just take a look here

It’s band 3, so Pfizer pays him ‘over £25,000’. (There is no band 4.)

And this is just what has been dug up, it wasn’t offered up. 

Conflicts of interest can be managed, but the first step in managing them is full disclosure and transparency. This has not happened. In a sane world, this would be a huge scandal. But our press was bought off many months ago.

When you have a real personal interest in something, it can be very difficult to think in an unbiased way. This doesn’t make Lim evil. It just makes him unethical, compromised and dangerous (along with everyone else that have put themselves in a similar position.)

Exhibit two

In the weeks prior to this U-turn, one JCVI member was very much against vaccinating children. Robert Dingwall became known on social media as the only outspoken critic of any suggestions in this direction, and behind the scenes he is understood to have lobbied his colleagues. He told the Spectator that his scepticsm, “was not by any means an outlier in discussions within the committee.”

A week or so before the u-turn, Dingwall and a number of other members of the covid sub-committee were fired from the JCVI.

Let’s be clear. The medical-political establishment in this country is entirely intertwined. The NHS is the only game in town, the government is the only game in town, which means anyone questioning the dogma loses their positions, perks, income and means to practice. If you doubt that, just ask the world’s leading epidemiologist how things are going.  

There is a very simple reason why these doctors are not speaking out. Self-preservation.

Ultimately, if there was a good reason to extend this risky and rushed programme to children, they would have given it. They would be singing it from the roof tops. But they aren’t. Because it does not exist. 

I wanted to give Professor Lim the final word, because that’s only fair. So I dug out his least objectionable refrain. But you know, the more I read it, the less comforted I feel.

“We place a high value on the safety of children and young people, and that reflects the public viewpoint as well.”

  • 1
  • 2
Childrens union logo reversed small

Contact Us

© Children's Union. All rights reserved.