Liz Truss: you have all the information, and no excuses

After nearly two-years of censorship, defamation and denial-of-access by the establishment, the Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Group was at last granted access to 10 Downing Street to present their case against the Covid vaccination of children to the British Prime Minister.

On Tuesday morning, a delegation led by Dr Ros Jones, the retired paediatrician who has been on the front-line of protecting children from establishment group-think, knocked on the door of Number 10 and handed a letter, co-signed by all members of the CCVAC and hundreds more British health professionals, calling for an end to the “avoidable damage” being done to our children as a result of the mRNA Covid vaccines, as well as harmful restrictions in schools.

The open letter published here, references leading studies from across the world – information that the CCVAC has delivered on several occasions to the UK’s health authorities, rarely receiving an acknowledgement and never a response.

In February, Dr Ros Jones was physically prevented from delivering a similar letter to the headquarters of the UK’s sinister Health Security Agency, despite having a pre-arranged meeting to do so.

However in recent months, the catastrophe of the mass roll-out of the covid vaccine to young people has apparently become too great even for its architects to ignore.

On the same day the CCVAC delivered their letter, across the Atlantic a member of the US Federal Drug Administration said that young people should not take the latest Covid drugs, since they had only ever been tested on mice. Here’s what Dr Paul Offit said:

“When you are asking people to get a vaccine, I think there has to be clear evidence of benefit…. You’d like to have, at least, human data. Right now they’re saying we should trust mouse data and I don’t think that should ever be true.”

But the dangers have been known for much longer. On the very day, back in February, when the UK’s vaccine ‘offer’ was made to children as young as five, the government revealed that some 1,200 Britons had suffered heart damage from the vaccine. As the international data clearly shows, the risk of such heart damage is inversely correlated with age: in other words, those least at risk to the virus (in fact, statistically zero risk) are most at risk to the vaccine. So the vaccine was known to pose a disproportionate risk to children when they ‘offered’ it.

Then earlier this month, in its ‘Green book’ of guidance that the government issues to civil servants in its employ (yes, that means your doctor), it quietly changed its position, removing the ‘offer’ for 5-11 year olds.

This major change in policy was not accompanied by an announcement, statement or press release. In the dry guidance, this ‘offer’, which had been aggressively marketed to all parents of young children, was suddenly re-caste as a ‘one-off’ and ‘non-urgent’ offer that, in light of the ‘extremely low risk’ of Covid for children, was now being rescinded.

Speaking on GB News after the submission, Dr Jones said:

“The problem is that politicians won’t just be honest about it.

“At least in Denmark, [the spokesman] said ‘if I had known what I know now, I never would have recommended it’ and that’s what we need Liz Truss to do.

“Otherwise there are all these other mRNA vaccines waiting up the road, [including] a new flu vaccine, using this technology, which has been so disastrous, and far less safe than previous standard vaccines.”