In an unprecedented move, members of the British medical establishment, convened by the CCVAC, are launching a legal challenge against the UK government’s ‘offer’ of a covid ‘vaccine’ to healthy 5-to-11-year-olds, on behalf of a British mother and her children.
The action is supported by Beverley Turner, a radio and TV personality and leading campaigner for child protection.
It also employs the same top legal team that is challenging the government on the 12–15-year-old roll-out. (For official reasons, the team is obliged to open a new case for this younger age group.)
The case is being crowd funded and we need your support. Please donate here.
Last chance to get answers
In the absence of an independent critical media or political opposition on this issue, this is the only opportunity there will ever be to force the government to account for its decision.
Without the funds to bring this case, officials will get off unchallenged and we will have set a dangerous precedent for healthcare policy in this country.
We have an extremely strong argument, and while this does not necessarily translate into a high probability of winning in court, it is of vital importance that these arguments are made – and the government’s response recorded – to form part of an immutable public record.
Government climb down
The government has recently begun to climb down on many covid policies as the evidence becomes too obvious to ignore, but it is stubbornly pushing ahead with the least logical, most reckless policy of all – experimental pharmaceutical interventions on our children.
The complete lack of any risk-benefit case for children is set out in a letter that has been sent to the government, with two ‘must-read’ annexes that list the facts and evidence in support.
An insult to free and informed consent
The weakness of the government’s position is signalled by the word ‘offer’ – intended to imply a freedom-of-choice, when parents and children have been denied basic information on the vaccine and its (side-)effects (on the basis they are unqualified to judge the risk). This is not informed-consent, it is a false choice.
Our legal team will dismantle this grossly irresponsible policy, piece by piece, and show:
- There is no benefit to children or anyone else;
- There is demonstrable risk of life-changing injury;
- And adverse reactions will be hundreds of thousands;
- Some adverse will be extremely serious and some deaths are to be expected.
For the jaw-dropping detail, and as an excellent resource for parents to share, read:
Several countries, such as Norway and Sweden, have already refused to give them to children on the basis they provide no benefit. The UK must follow.
There is an emergency, but it’s not from Omicron. It’s from this negligent policy.
Read the Annexes, see for yourself. Then help us make a difference:
Please pledge your support for this case.
The costs will be in six figures and every donation counts.
