Author: ross
Press release: CCAG urges pause to roll-out for children and young people
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
London: 12.00, Monday 14th February 2022
- CCAG invites government advisers to urgent meeting and review
- Latest data shows Pfizer vaccine increases risk of omicron infection
- New ONS data indicates 2-3 excess deaths per week of teenage boys, correlating with vaccine rollout
- Roll-out to children is therefore all risk and no benefit
The Children’s Covid Advisory Group (CCAG) has written to the government’s advisory body on vaccination, the JCVI, and the UK’s Chief Medical Officers, to request an urgent meeting and an immediate pause to the roll-out of covid vaccines to children, pending the results of a public inquiry.
The request comes in light of new evidence of a safety signal in young males suggesting increasing fatalities that has not been investigated by regulators.
In the context of new evidence from the Health Security Agency that the covid vaccine recipients are at a greater risk of infection with omicron than the unvaccinated, the CCAG writes “the time has come to pause and acknowledge there is no emergency for children.”
Meanwhile, “on the risk side of the balance sheet,” the group reports a catalogue of new data from around the world that shows the risks of serious adverse reactions are shockingly high, particularly among boys. Data from Hong Kong showed 1 in 2680 boys aged 12-17 developing myocarditis after their second Pfizer shot, a potentially life-threatening inflammation of the heart muscle and they have moved to a single dose regime. Also “very worrying” report from the CDC on 5- to 11-year-olds, showed 100 children with “serious adverse events”, including myocarditis, seizures and death. “This in itself, is a reason to review,” wrote the group.
The group notes that members wrote to the government’s advisers and the regulator, the MHRA, in January, requesting an urgent investigation of the acknowledged increase in all-cause mortality in males aged 15-19 since the Pfizer covid vaccine rollout began for them in May 2021. “It is very disappointing not to have received any response”, they wrote.
The group requests that the government’s advisers conduct a review of “the risk/benefit analysis, without delay”; and to cease any further roll-out pending the results of that review.
Dr Ros Jones, retired paediatrician and convener of the CCAG, said: “In the context of a temporary use authorisation, the utmost care is required to identify any safety signals quickly, the precautionary principle must apply, and an immediate pause be implemented. In the face of omicron, this vaccine offers children all risk and no benefit.
“That means a single vaccine injury or death in a child would be inexcusable. And yet the possibility that there might already be a hidden number of adolescent deaths is unconscionable. The balance of evidence favours natural immunity. It’s time to pause the roll-out.”
She added: “If the current situation had existed six months ago, there would have been no case made for commencing routine rollout for healthy children. What we are witnessing is a form of medical apathy and political path dependency. Our children deserve better. Now, at a time when it is proposed that even those testing positive for omicron do not need to isolate, we are continuing to put children at risk with a vaccine they simply do not need.”
Professor Angus Dalgleish of St Georges Hospital, London said: “”It is vital that as the facts change, the advice does accordingly. Covid is no more a problem in children than other childhood respiratory diseases and yet the data continue to confirm that more young people are suffering serious cardiac damage than can ever be justified. I myself know of two such cases which used to be the definition of common”
This is the second letter the JCVI has received in recent days urging for the child covid vaccine roll-out to be paused. On Thursday 10 February, a separate group of 30 MPs, doctors and scientists, wrote that “we find it genuinely remarkable that, given the prior JCVI concerns, formal studies have not been put in place during the rollout in these age groups with acknowledged limited benefit and significant knowledge gaps regarding safety.”
About the CCAG
The Children’s Covid Advisory Group comprises a wide number of health professionals and scientists including several of the country’s leading professors in medicine, microbiology and risk, as well as specialists in public health, emergency medicine, paediatrics, infectious disease and primary care. They include:
- Dr Rosamond Jones, MBBS, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician, convener CCVAG (Children’s Covid Vaccines Advisory Group)
- Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London
- Professor David Livermore, BSc, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University of East Anglia
- Professor Anthony J Brookes, Professor of Genomics and Health Data Science, University of Leicester
- Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh
- Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges Hospital, London
- Professor John Fairclough FRCS FFSEM retired Honorary Consultant Surgeon
- Professor Norman Fenton, CEng, CMath, PhD, FBCS, MIET, Professor of Risk Information Management, Queen Mary University of London
- Professor Anthony Fryer, PhD FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry
- Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary under-secretary of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine
- Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath
- Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation, Beecham Pharmaceuticals
- 1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham
- Dr Roland Salmon, MB BS, MRCGP, FFPH, Former Director, Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre Wales
- Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH. Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology
- Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD. Postdoctoral researcher in microbiology and immunology
- Katherine MacGilchrist, BSc (Hons), MSc, CEO/Systematic Review Director, Epidemica Ltd.
- Mr James Royle, MBChB, FRCS, MMedEd, Colorectal surgeon
- Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt, PhD, Clinical Scientist
- Dr Elizabeth Evans MA(Cantab), MBBS, DRCOG, Retired Doctor
- Dr Rohaan Seth, Bsc (hons), MBChB (hons), MRCGP, Retired General Practitioner
- Dr Emma Brierly, MRCGP, General Practitioner
- Dr Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician
- Mr Malcolm Loudon, MBChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS(Gen Surg), MIHM,VR, Consultant Surgeon
- Dr Alan Black, MBBS, MSc, DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician
- Dr David Cartland, MBChB, BMedSci, General practitioner
- Dr Peter Chan, BM, MRCS, MRCGP, NLP, General Practitioner, Functional medicine practitioner
- Dr Greta Mushet, MBChB, MRCPsych, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy
- Dr Samuel McBride, MBBCh, BAO, BSc, MSc, MRCP (UK) FRCEM, FRCP (Edinburgh), NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics
- Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist
- Dr Branko Latinkic, BSc, PhD, Reader in Biosciences
- Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, General Practitioner
- Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner
- Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London
- Dr Tanya Klymenko, PhD, FHEA, FIBMS, Senior lecturer in Biomedical Sciences
- Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational Health Practitioner
- Dr Carmen Wheatley, DPhil, Orthomolecular Oncology
- Dr Charles Lane OBE, Molecular Biologist
- Mr Angus Robertson BSc (Med. Sci.) MB ChB FRCS(Ed) FFSEM(UK) Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon
- Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB MRCGP Retired General Practitioner
- Dr Jayne LM Donegan, MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, General Practitioner
- Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD in Pharmacology, 32 years’ experience in Pharmaceutical R&D
- Dr Keith Johnson, BA, D.Phil (Oxon), IP Consultant for Diagnostic Testing
- Julie Annakin, RN, Immunisation Specialist Nurse
- Rev Dr William J U Philip MB ChB, MRCP, BD, Senior Minister The Tron Church, Glasgow, formerly physician specialising in cardiology
- Dr Jonathan Rogers MBChB (Bristol) MRCGP DRCOG Retired NHS General Practitioner
- Dr Pauline Jones, MB BS, Retired General Practitioner
- Dr Emma Brierly, MBBS, MRCGP, General Practitioner
- Dr Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, Retired General Practitioner
- Dr Franziska Meuschel, MD, ND, PhD, LFHom, BSEM, Nutritional, Environmental and Integrated Medicine
- Dr Michael Bazlinton, MBCHB MRCGP DCH
- Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant Palliative Care Medicine
- Dr Julian Tomkinson, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner, GP Trainer, PCME
- Dr David Bramble, MBChB, MRCPsych, MD, Consultant Psychiatrist
- Dr Christina Peers, MBBS, DRCOG, DFSRH, FFSRH, Menopause Specialist
- Dr Chris Newton, PhD, Biochemist working in immuno-metabolism
- Dr Christopher Exley, PhD, FRSB, Bioinoganic Chemist
- Dr Sarah Myhill, MBBS, Retired General Practitioner
- Jessica Righart, Senior Critical Care Scientist
- Dr Michael D Bell, MBChB, MRCGP, retired General Practitioner
- Dr Angharad Powell, MBChB, General Practitioner
- Dr Stephen Ting, MB CHB, MRCP, PhD, Consultant Physician
- Mr Ahmad K Malik, FRCS (Tr & Orth), Dip Med Sport, Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon
- Dr Catherine Hatton, MBChB, General Practitioner
- Dr Kulvinder S. Manik MBChB, MRCGP, MA(Cantab), LLM, Gray’s Inn
- Dr Stefanie Williams, MD, Dermatologist
- Kim Bull, Foundation Degree in Paramedic Science, Paramedic
- Margaret Moss, MA (Cantab), CBiol, MRSB, Director, The Nutrition and Allergy Clinic, Cheshire
- Dr Haleema Sheikh, MRCGP, General Practitioner
- James Cook, NHS Registered Nurse, Bachelor of Nursing (Hons), Master of Public Health (MPH)
- Dr Jonathan Engler, MBChB, LlB (Hons), DipPharmMed
- Dr Clare Craig, BMBCh, FRCPath, Pathologist
- Dr David Bell, MBBS, PhD, FRCP(UK), Public Health Physician
- Dr Ruth Wilde, MB BCh, MRCEM, AFMCP, Integrative & Functional Medicine Doctor
- John Collis, RN, Specialist Nurse Practitioner
- Dr Damien Downing, MBBS, MRSB, private physician
- Mr Lasantha Wijesinghe, FRCS, Consultant Vascular Surgeon
- Dr Claire Mottram, BSc Hons, MBChB, General Practitioner
- Dr Ali Haggett, Mental health community work, 3rd sector, former lecturer in the history of medicine
- Dr Jenny Goodman, MA, MBChB, Ecological Medicine
- Suzanne Tomkinson BSc MSc CSci FIBMS Senior Biomedical Scientist (Clinical Biochemistry)
- Dr Felicity Lillingstone, IMD DHS PhD ANP, Doctor, Urgent Care, Research Fellow
- Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL
- Anna Phillips, RSCN, BSc Hons, Clinical Lead Trainer Clinical Systems (Paediatric Intensive Care)
- Dr Jason Lester, MRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist
- Dr Sue de Lacy MBBS MRCGP AFMCP UK Integrative Medicine Doctor
- Dr David Morris, MBChB, MRCP (UK), General Practitioner
- Dr Andrew Isaac, MB BCh, Physician, retired
- Dr Renee Hoenderkamp, General Practitioner
- Dr Noel Thomas, MA, MBChB, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, Retired Doctor
- Dr Fiona Martindale, MBChB, MRCGP, General Practitioner in out of hours
- Dr Zac Cox, BDS, LCPH, Dental Practitioner
- Mr Colin Natali, BSc(hons) MBBS, FRCS (Orth), Consultant Spinal Surgeon
The letter can be found in full, here.
A ‘New Normal’ Guide
Are you up with the latest inversions in the ‘new normal’? We are here to help.
Below, we have translated some key terms, with linked references.
| What they say | What they mean |
| “Safety” | Mass neurosis |
| “Consensus” | Mass formation |
| “Informed” | Deceived |
| “Consent” | Coerced |
| “(Cov)idiots” | Normal, decent people and professors of disease prevention |
| “Government support” | Psychological warfare |
| “Guidance” | Bullying |
| “Compliance” | Violence |
| “Reality” | Computer models |
| “Conspiracy theory” | Tomorrow’s news |
| “Science” | Dogma |
| “Misinformation” | Science |
| “Independent” | Financed by the Gates Foundation |
| “Trusted News Initiative” | Globally co-ordinated propaganda |
| “Face covering” | Submission signalling |
| “Fact-checkers” | Paid propagandists |
| “Public-private partnership” | Corruption |
| Circuit breaker | Spirit breaker |
| “Regulator” | Sales agency |
| “Vaccinated” | Your body is a pharma spike factory |
| “Book your vaccination” | Book your vacation |
| “Anti-vaxx” | Seeking answers |
| “Anti-vaxx” | Vaccine injured |
| “Anti-vaxx” | Seeking answers, gets x2 vaccinations, then dies |
| “Anti-vaxx” | Bereaved |
| Pfizer vaccine trial group | People vaccinated by Pfizer |
| Pfizer placebo group | People vaccinated by Pfizer |
| Pfizer vaccine “100% effective” | Placebo group: 2 covid deaths Vaccine group: 1 covid death (and 5 heart attacks) |
| Pfizer vaccine “harmless” | Zero legal liability for all vaccine makers |
| “Safety data is available” | But embargoed for 75 years |
| “Far right groups” | Transparency campaigners |
| “Covid death” | Died after positive test |
| “Covid death” | Killed within 14 days of vaccination |
| “Covid death” | Terminal illness + positive test |
| “Covid death” | Killed in care home by systematic midazolam overdose |
| “Care homes” | Death camps |
| “Care pathways” | Death protocols |
| “Horse medicine” | Effective prophylactic |
| “Antiseptic” | Effective prophylactic |
| Palliative and early treatments | Poison |
| “Pundits” | Professors of immunology, vaccine inventors |
| “Pandemic experts” | Computer modellers |
| “Social (distancing)” | Isolating |
| “Isolating” | Solitary confinement |
| “Gain-of-function” | Bio–weaponization |
| “Safe and effective” | Lethal and immuno-degrading |
| “Safe in pregnancy“ | It’s birth control |
| “Safe for children” | Children are at most risk |
| “Vaccinate vulnerable children” | They are more vulnerable to vax injury |
| “Mild” | Not mild |
| “Mild” | Permanent heart damage |
| “Mild” | Fatal |
| “Rare“ | Normal |
| “Vaccine passports” | Identity cards |
| “Furlough” | Sabotage of global economy and savings |
| “Central bank digital currencies” | Contingent pocket-money |
| “Sustainability” | Depopulation |
Here is the data on child Pfizer death. It is chilling.
An analysis of ONS data has shown that children are 52 times more likely to die after a covid shot than ‘unvaccinated’ children. In addition, the data, shows that the risk increases rapidly for younger children, and for second doses.
According to an analysis by the Daily Expose, in the first 10 months of last year, Pfizer vaccinated teenagers between 15-19 years old were 200% more likely to die than untreated teenagers. Meanwhile, vaccinated children between 10-14 years old were 1,000% more likely to die than those children who did have a covid vaccination.
In addition, the analysis of the government’s official data (which you can read in full here) shows that the second vaccine shot radically increases the chances of death. After the second shot, the risk rises to 300% for the older teenagers, and 5,200% for those under 14 years – based on a death rate of 238 per 100,000 person years.
However, even this grossly understates the true risk for several reasons.
The figures include children between 10 and 11 years old, an age group that is not eligible for vaccination in the UK. In addition, deaths within two weeks after vaccination are added to the unvaccinated count, not the vaccinated count, even though about half of all vaccine deaths occur in this period.
The failure of the mainstream news services to report on this should be shocking, if it did not follow a consistent pattern of ignoring all evidence that would detract from the sale of pharmaceuticals and government policy.
In addition, the Daily Expose’s analysis was in spite of the recalcitrant behaviour of the ONS and obfuscation in its presentation and reporting. According to the Daily Expose, the ONS inadvertently released enough details on deaths along children and adults in its Deaths by Vaccination status dataset.
Furthermore, the UK government had been sitting on the data for more than a month, allowing children and teenagers to continue to be vaccinated, while secretly adding up the resulting deaths. For a disease that does not kill them.
Infantile adults are everybody’s problem
It’s a wonderful thing to live in a country where the rules that govern our everyday lives are compatible with good sense and reason.
Most of us have taken that for granted, so we’ve not had to think: what should we do if the rules are irrational or, worse still, downright wrong?
Blind obedience is a virtue, but only for very young children. They know so little about the world and can be a danger to themselves and others. The criteria for a good baby or toddler is basically just that – compliance with adult wishes.
But absolute obedience stops becoming a virtue pretty quickly. For a toddler it’s fine, but no parent should be happy if their child still unquestioningly obeys them when they are 10. To thrive in the world as a responsible adult, they need to develop judgement, good sense and the courage to act on it in the face of ‘authority’.
In the modern age, whole societies periodically lapse into this infantile mode.
For this to happen, the groundwork must be laid: adults need a father figure. For a long-time this was God and religion, but these days of course, it’s the State. Outsourcing our personal responsibilities to the State begins when we vote for strength in the face of external threats; when we choose to display our ‘kindness’, not through acts of personal charity and sacrifice, but by paying more tax. Soon, people begin to identify their moral worth by how they vote rather than how they act in the world. Immolation to the State becomes a proxy for morality.
And so adults cease to be ‘consenting.’ They become – not children even – but infants, toddlers. Meanwhile, the State becomes ‘tyrannical father’ and ‘devouring mother’.
It’s untenable though, because, in a very real sense, there is no such thing as a ‘State’. Yes, there are instruments and machineries of power. But they are just wielded by other toddlers. If the State is the people, and the people are infantilised, then adult supervision is an illusion. No government or legal system, however august or ancient, can uphold moral rights when presided over by grown-up infants. In such a situation, reason gives way to the moral imperative of the creche: fear, jealousy and greed.
An inevitable consequence of adults behaving as children is that children must be treated as adults. It is therefore logical that they are given autonomy and decision-making power over whether to irrevocably change their hormones and sex, for example, or their genetic make-up via a novel drug.
During the French Revolution, there was a popular saying. “Revolutions devour their children.” It was not just a metaphor. Many children were executed by the French revolutionary state, and many more ‘unofficially’ massacred. (Children can be a real threat to ideologies, you know.) Infantile societies destroy their children too. It begins by removing their innocence, then their childhood, and if it persists, it ends in blood.
I’m reminded of those buffoons at international football matches and political shindigs last summer while tens of thousands of perfectly healthy children were locked at home ‘isolating’. Their parents and teachers were all following the rules and held their heads up in society for doing so.
And now we are entering, not the endgame, but perhaps the Squidgame. A risky pharmaceutical intervention to alter children’s genes. An unconscionable act with no plausible medical justification. It simply fulfils a deep psychological need among infantilised adults: to demonstrate State allegiance through child sacrifice. And let’s not forget, there’s the added kicker of being able to vacation abroad.
Make no mistake, every act of mindless compliance to nonsensical rules that every adult makes, trickles and then floods down on to children.
Every time you wear a mask, even though you know its efficacy has no basis in empiricism.
Every time you track-and-trace.
Every time you nod along to some virtue-signalling covid conversation.
Every time you submit your body to medical coercion, you deny to all children the freedoms you were born with and that our grandparents’ generation fought and died to protect.
You deny them the freedom to act out of conscience and personal responsibility, and the freedom to say ‘no’.
It’s not the State. There is no State. It’s me, and it’s you.
We are the problem.
Our compliance is violence.
________________________________________________
Ross Butler is founder of the Children’s Union
British Heart Foundation’s graphic advert prompts ‘please explain’
Monday, 17th January 2022
Dr Charmaine Griffiths
CEO, British Heart Foundation
Dear Charmaine,
Re: Questions concerning your TV advert and website
A number of our supporters asked me to get in touch with you, having seen your advert on television.
I watched the full version, called ‘This is science’, on your website. The main character is Sophie, a teenager who collapses on a soccer pitch, as her mother screams her name, and she drops to the floor, lifeless eyes rolling back. It’s shocking stuff.
Our followers would like to know:
What was the impetus behind focusing on children for this major campaign?
Presumably you are signalling that such events are not uncommon. But of course, that’s only true of 2021. Your advert normalises children having sudden, serious heart conditions, when it is ‘normal’ only in the context of the unprecedented covid vaccine rollout to young people. As you must know, while covid poses healthy children no statistically measurable risk, these vaccines are much more dangerous for them than for adults.
Your advert is called: ‘This is science’. But the only science on your coronavirus web pages is psychological manipulation.
It talks of covid leading to heart problems, without mentioning that the covid spike that causes these complications is also in the vaccines but in vastly greater quantities, which is why kids weren’t dropping on football pitches during the 2020 pandemic, but only after the vaccine roll out.
You are pushing everyone to get double jabbed. “Everyone”, it says. Is this your medical advice, Dr Griffiths? Does “everyone” include children?
Do you see the invidious position you have placed the British Heart Foundation in?
You are raising funds to cure people’s heart conditions, while pushing the sale of the very drugs that cause the heart conditions in the first place. You are turning the British Heart Foundation into a racket.
I can only think that you and Professor Sir Nilesh Samani have sleep-walked into a nightmare, and you are struggling to wake up. On behalf of every child and young person whose heart and life you will ruin, we are ringing the alarm bell.
Wake up, get up, and start doing your job.
Yours sincerely,
Ross Butler
Founder, The Children’s Union
It has never been so easy to save a child’s life. Act now
The vaccinators are in our schools. The time to act is right now. You can do three things right now.
- Inform headteachers of ongoing legal challenge
It’s not been covered in the media, but the law courts have put a huge dent in the government’s child vaccination plans and undermined its ethical basis.
At a high court hearing in early October, an injunction was sought to pause the mass rollout of Covid vaccinations for healthy children aged between 12 to 16 years.
High Court judge, Mr Justice Jay, accepted that there was sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the mass vaccination of healthy children may be unlawful.
Since the jabs don’t prevent infection or transmission, the government bench failed to offer any rational or plausible basis for the policy. However, given the political shock that stopping the roll out would cause, they have been granted 11 days to prepare better evidence. In the meantime, most Britain’s school children will be offered the chance to irreversibly join this dangerous and unnecessary experiment.
Safer to wait have written this letter that you can send to the head teachers in your area, explaining their moral and legal liability in the face of this development. Download it, sign and send:
https://t.co/17z9RUduWq?amp=1
2. NHS style consent form – leaflet drop
We have been sent this excellent consent form which you can print out and distribute in your local area.
Children are being vaccinated now, and they are under great peer and authoritative pressure. They need something in their hands to use as a last line of defence. This could be it.
3. Cover letter
If you wish, you could use this cover letter to provide some context and further information about the risks and supposed benefits of child vaccination.
The message
If you are going to be active, you may be put on the spot, and asked why you don’t think children should be vaccinated.
There are so many reasons not to vaccinate children it can be difficult to know where to begin in the heat of the moment.
Our analysis of people’s motivations suggests that emphasising people’s personal risk is not effective on its own. It must be couple with the fact that the jab will not actually do any good, since they were not designed to prevent transmission.
The pharmaceutical companies have tried to fudge this by advertising relative risk reductions of 99%. However, the standard measure of efficacy is absolute risk reduction, and these are so small as to be within the margin of statistical error.
In other words, there is no discernible benefit.
The cruellest thing a child could do to their parents is to risk their life, completely unnecessarily.
I would like to thank you all in advance. We can’t save everyone. So work on that basis that you can prevent one family from having their lives shattered.
Good luck.
“It’s a ritual”. Psych Professor diagnoses child covid vaccination
A leading statistician and professor of psychology at Ghent University, Mattias Desmet, has described the international efforts to inject children with the experimental covid vaccines as ‘a ritual’.
Talking to the Children’s Union, Professor Desmet said he began to consider the covid situation from a psychological perspective after it became clear that the science and modelling was no longer being used to update policy.
“While the corona measures claimed to be based on science and mathematical models, the strange thing was, the measures were not correct when it was proved the models were wrong. The measures continued as if they were independent of any mathematical modelling at all.”
“From then on I began to consider the crisis from a psychological perspective, and to wonder what was going on in our society [that the entire covid measures were disproportionate to the biological reality of the crisis]”
Professor Desmet has concluded that a significant proportion of society has been gripped by a well documented psychological phenomenon known as ‘mass formation’, which results in a narrowing of the field of attention, allowing people lose their perspective on wider moral issues. People in this condition are not sensitive to rational arguments and don’t seem to notice the collateral damage of the measures.
“This is very strange because the collateral damage is huge,” he said.
Professor Desmet, who lectures on mass formation at the University of Ghent, said those under the influence of mass formation are in a mode of extreme selflessness, and are willing to sacrifice themselves and those they love in the name of whatever narrow perspective they have focused in on.
“Also the mass vaccination of children is a ritual. It’s a ritual in which someone shows he is radically loyal to the collective; that he wants to sacrifice everything that is precious to himself as a sign of the importance of the social bond. It’s ritualistic behaviour…. We all grasped in a huge ritual which establishes a new kind of social bond.”
How to dehypnotize the world
We want to share a BIG IDEA, with the potential of ending this war on children. Notes beneath.
Why has the world become so willing to sacrifice children for no reason, and how we can end this war against them, once and for all?
The concept of “mass formation” was put forward by Professor Matthias Desmet of Ghent University in a testimony to the Corona Auschuss. Watch it here.
The ideas are influenced by Gustave Le Bon’s seminal paper on crowd psychology. (It’s a classic of 20th century scientific literature, incredibly un-PC.) Read it here.
If this is what is happening, we need to build new strategies and approaches that have real psychological merit. We welcome feedback. Please share with anyone that might be able to take it further.
Open letter to Chris Whitty on his ‘impact assessment’ of vaccinating teens
Read our open letter to Professor Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer, regarding the government’s request for him to consider vaccinating 12-15 year olds, despite the JCVI’s opposition.
—————————–
Professor Chris Whitty
Chief Medical Officer
HM Government
By email: c.whitty@nhs.net
Dear Chris,
Re: ‘Chief medical officers to consider vaccinating people [sic] aged 12 to 15 following JCVI advice’
After so many untested non-medical interventions on our children, the government finally wants an impact assessment.
Government ministers want you, Chris, to consider “the wider impacts” of not giving children the Covid treatment, specifically:
‘the impact on schools and young people’s education, which has been disproportionately impacted by the pandemic.’
You see the problem, I’m sure. The pandemic didn’t close schools. The government did. As such, they are asking you to respond, not to a genuine enquiry, but to a threat: if you don’t sanction this risky medical intervention, our non-medical intervention may hurt children even more.
The JCVI held the line last week. The government-convened panel of experts refused to sanction the covid treatment for children. Under great political pressure to give it the green light, they had to consider covid, long covid, short term health impacts like myocarditis, the incidence of death following vaccination, the long-term health impacts on children that have their whole lives ahead of them. And they said, no. Don’t do it.
So now, unable to justify this medical intervention on medical grounds, the government wants you to justify it on the grounds of reactive policy. But policy isn’t inevitable. They set it. They don’t really want an impact assessment, Chris. They want a parody of one, with your signature beneath it.
Let’s be clear on your task. The government has asked you to weigh-up two false and unnecessary alternatives; and to tell them which will be the least effective at hurting, maiming and killing children. They will then implement one of them.
You have another option, Chris. You can just say no. None of the above.
Children don’t have a choice here. And their parents won’t really have one. Only you do.
We have wanted an impact assessment on school closures since March 2020. But we are now in a position where, if such an assessment were conducted, it would be used as an excuse to vaccinate children against medical advice. The truth has been weaponised. That’s what happens you make concessions against logic in the name of political expediency. You undo 300 years of scientific progress.
Don’t be a part of it, Chris.
Say “none of the above”.
Yours sincerely,
Ross Butler
Founder
