Author: cu_admin

Thursday, 31 March, 2022

Dear members of the FDA vaccines committee,

RE: Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine EUA application for children aged 6 months to 4 years, returning to FDA in April

I urge you to please do not ignore the evidence from pathology studies.

Privately initiated by family members, devasted from their loss and seeking to know the truth, pathology studies have demonstrated a connection of the death with the vaccine; here some references from the UK [1,2], Italy [3,4], Germany [5] and USA [6].

I would like to draw your attention to the systematic work of pathologists Prof Burkhardt and Prof Land on tissue samples obtained from 19 autopsies, presented at the second Pathologist Conference in Germany on the 4^th of December 2021 [5], which has demonstrated a communality across the pathological findings: vessels infiltrated by T-lymphocytes, brain vessels full of swollen endothelia cells desquamated from the walls, destroyed capillaries in liver and lungs, tissue changes with lymphocytes infiltration and accumulation in previously healthy organs including myocardium and pericardium.

In particular, I would like to bring to your attention the latest findings of Prof Burkhardt work [7], which have been disseminated this month. His immuno-histological investigation has succeeded in detecting the spike protein in the cells of vessel walls of the samples and, furthermore, to confirm its provenance from the vaccine as opposed to SARS-CoV 2 (e.g. excluding its provenance from a breakthrough infection).

This would constitute the first proof of the suspicion that the spike protein, expressed by our own cells under the genetic instructions of the mRNA or viral vector vaccines, is responsible for inducing the inflammation and destruction seen in the blood vessels and organ’s tissues.

These findings would obviously have enormous implications and need to be verified independently. I urge you to promote properly funded post-mortem and histopathological studies in connection with the deaths and damages associated with Covid-19 vaccines, and to incorporate in them the methodology described in [7]. Such studies would provide the ultimate, and much needed, evidence to answer the warring concerns surrounding these vaccines..

Finally, I urge you to reject the Pfizer’s EUA application for children of 6 months to 4 years old, in the light of lack of benefits and of immense risks posed to this age group. Primum non nocere.

Livia

Dr Livia Tossici-Bolt

Phd, Clinical Scientist

Member of the Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council

References:

[1] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-58330796

[2] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10233341/Musician-40-suffered-brain-haemorrhage-induced-AstraZeneca-Covid-vaccine-inquest-hears.html

[3] https://www.eventiavversinews.it/primo-esito-dellautopsia-per-la-morte-del-24enne-trentino-pochi-giorni-dopo-pfizer-confermata-lemorragia-cerebrale/

[4] https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2022/01/28/camilla-canepa-le-indagini-i-medici-sapevano-che-aveva-fatto-il-vaccino-ma-non-lo-scrissero-nella-cartella-clinica/6471583/

[5] Gill et al “Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose” Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Feb 14.
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0435-SA.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35157759/

[6] Burkhardt and Land, “Are deaths and adverse health effects afterv vaccination against Covid-19 related in a pathologically detectable way?” Pathology Conference, December 4, 2021
https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/

[7] Burkhardt, “Pathology of vaccine deaths and vaccine injuries. After the evidence now first proof”. March 11, 2022
https://pathologie-konferenz.de/en/

In an unprecedented move, members of the British medical establishment, convened by the CCVAC, are launching a legal challenge against the UK government’s ‘offer’ of a covid ‘vaccine’ to healthy 5-to-11-year-olds, on behalf of a British mother and her children.

The action is supported by Beverley Turner, a radio and TV personality and leading campaigner for child protection. 

It also employs the same top legal team that is challenging the government on the 12–15-year-old roll-out. (For official reasons, the team is obliged to open a new case for this younger age group.)

The case is being crowd funded and we need your support. Please donate here.

Last chance to get answers

In the absence of an independent critical media or political opposition on this issue, this is the only opportunity there will ever be to force the government to account for its decision. 

Without the funds to bring this case, officials will get off unchallenged and we will have set a dangerous precedent for healthcare policy in this country. 

We have an extremely strong argument, and while this does not necessarily translate into a high probability of winning in court, it is of vital importance that these arguments are made – and the government’s response recorded – to form part of an immutable public record.  

Government climb down

The government has recently begun to climb down on many covid policies as the evidence becomes too obvious to ignore, but it is stubbornly pushing ahead with the least logical, most reckless policy of all – experimental pharmaceutical interventions on our children.

The complete lack of any risk-benefit case for children is set out in a letter that has been sent to the government, with two ‘must-read’ annexes that list the facts and evidence in support.

An insult to free and informed consent

The weakness of the government’s position is signalled by the word ‘offer’ – intended to imply a freedom-of-choice, when parents and children have been denied basic information on the vaccine and its (side-)effects (on the basis they are unqualified to judge the risk). This is not informed-consent, it is a false choice. 

Our legal team will dismantle this grossly irresponsible policy, piece by piece, and show: 

• There is no benefit to children or anyone else;
• There is demonstrable risk of life-changing injury;
• And adverse reactions will be hundreds of thousands;
• Some adverse will be extremely serious and some deaths are to be expected.

For the jaw-dropping detail, and as an excellent resource for parents to share, read:

• Letter before action re 5 to 11-year-olds
• Annex A – Benefits
• Annex B – Risks

Several countries, such as Norway and Sweden, have already refused to give them to children on the basis they provide no benefit. The UK must follow. 

There is an emergency, but it’s not from Omicron. It’s from this negligent policy.

Read the Annexes, see for yourself. Then help us make a difference:

Please pledge your support for this case.  

The costs will be in six figures and every donation counts.